User talk:Aajkibaat

Welcome!
Hello, Aajkibaat, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 11:18, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Getting started
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

April 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=603134984 your edit] to Rajat Sharma may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:18, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * File:India TV's Chairman and Editor in Chief Rajat Sharma.jpg

Manu Sharma
I have reverted your out of process move at Manu Sharma. Per WP:COMMONNAME the article title reflects the most common usage and is therefore correctly titled "Manu Sharma". The fact that you went through the article and attempted to wipe out that name through the removal of reliable sources and the actual falsification of the references is both completely contrary to Wikipedia policy and very disruptive. If you want to make an argument for a page move you can do so following the the appropriate process. If you are concerned about content, raise the topic on the talk page and get consensus for the changes.--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 16:29, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia. --Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 16:34, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for disruptive editing. I was very clear that your edits were disruptive and would lead to a block. I provided you with the information you needed in order to request a page move and pointed you to the talk page to discuss your concerns, but you ignored the advice and the warnings. Once your unblock expires it is imperative that you stop the page blanking, out of process moves, falsification of reference titles, and disruption at Manu Sharma and discuss your desired changes on the article talk page to see if there is consensus for the proposed changes, otherwise you will find yourself blocked again. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 16:42, 5 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Your first and only edit upon expiry of your block was to again blank the same sourced information and its associated citation from the same article, as such I have restored the block. The block is of indefinite duration, that is you are blocked until you can demonstrate to a reviewing admin that you will not continue the same disruptive unexplained blanking and will instead seek consensus for the changes you wish to make through discussion with other editors.--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:30, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
 * And I've just blocked a number of your sock accounts.--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 17:22, 12 June 2014 (UTC)