User talk:Aakashmalik23122

January 2020
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Space Shuttle—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 16:32, 24 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Please don't discard a constructive edit. You said that it didn't "appear" to be constructive. On what basis did you say that? I do know about space shuttles and they are not designed to ever reach GTO. A space shuttle could not reach GTO even if it had no payload. So payload to GTO is obviously 0 kg. Please reply asap. Aakashmalik23122 (talk) 16:38, 24 January 2020 (UTC)


 * You aren't quite as bright as you think you are. GTO stands for geostationary transfer orbit: this is an elliptical orbit with a low perigee and apogee at geosynchronous altitude. The Shuttle was certainly capable of launching payloads which carried their own propulsion to put themselves into geosynchronous (and geostationary) orbit. JustinTime55 (talk) 22:21, 28 January 2020 (UTC)


 * I know what GTO stands for. It was not possible for the space shuttle to have an apogee of ~36000 km in any case. Payloads which carry their own propulsion, you say? In that case, the shuttle itself still won't reach GTO. It was not possible for the shuttle to reach GTO in any case. Prove me wrong if you can. If you want to write anything above 0 kg in payload to GTO then you have to write a note saying "payloads with their own propulsion, not the shuttle itself." In payload to LEO, did you consider the payloads that have their own propulsion? No. Then why are you considering this in payload to GTO? Please consider only those payloads that remain in the space shuttle payload bay.
 * P.S. If you're bright then you shouldn't make others who use wikipedia as a source less bright by telling them that space shuttle was capable of carrying payloads to GTO. I hope you'll understand this for the betterment of any common man who reads this article. Aakashmalik23122 (talk) 05:16, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Space Shuttle. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges.

''Please discuss on the talk page of the article in question and do a quick review of the be bold, revert, discuss process. You should be discussing this issue on the Space Shuttle talk page and not edit warring. Thanks!''  Kees08  (Talk)   18:19, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Space Shuttle; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.Please discuss your proposed changes at the Space Shuttle talk page, located at Talk:Space Shuttle prior to making the revision.  Kees08  (Talk)   16:29, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * Have you read what I wrote as an explanation to the edit above? Aakashmalik23122 (talk) 08:50, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, and while the explanation is appreciated, that discussion needs to occur at Talk:Space Shuttle.  Kees08  (Talk)   15:29, 31 January 2020 (UTC)


 * While the wikipedia article remains incorrect for the common person? Tell me, is space shuttle capable of reaching GTO? Secondly, whom do I talk to in the talk page? How do I proceed? Aakashmalik23122 (talk) 16:30, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Read WP:Talk page guidelines. Every article page has a Talk page; you just press the Talk tab to access it. Press the New section page to start a new post thread. (DO NOT just insert new threads at the top; they go at the bottom of the page.) You don't necessarily talk to anyone specific; the people who watch the page will see your post and respond.
 * You actually have a lot to learn before you can contribute effectively to Wikipedia (which we all would like to see): how to collaborate with other editors; and how to get to the root cause and ultimate fix of a problem. The article uses an infobox which is Template:Infobox spaceflight. This doesn't have GTO hardwired in it; that is set as an input which can be easily changed to Geosynchronous orbit, with the appropriate payload and note that an upper stage is used. JustinTime55 (talk) 16:53, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

I joined wikipedia specifically because I wanted this info about space shuttle to be correct. Yes, the note should be added "the payload has its own thrusters". Please add this note then. Aakashmalik23122 (talk) 18:09, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
 * So, apparently you just want to remove info you don't think is correct, and you want other people to actually do the work of researching accurate information to add to the encyclopedia? Please take a moment to read WP:BUILDWP. JustinTime55 (talk) 18:56, 31 January 2020 (UTC)


 * I have done that research. That's why I was editing in the first place. Apparently you didn't and you want wrong info to stay. Is that your reason to revert my edits? It's alright, you're playing your role in providing incorrect facts to people. I was politely asking you to edit the wrong info. If you don't, I will. If I don't, someone else will. Aakashmalik23122 (talk) 19:51, 31 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Look, someone added Inertial upper stage in payloads to GTO and Geostationary orbits, which is correct. I told you, someone will edit the wrong info and make it correct. I told you if I don't correct the wrong info then someone else will. But you kept reverting my edits even after I explained that the shuttle cannot reach GTO. I had done my research. Aakashmalik23122 (talk) 20:05, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
 * I am the "someone" who added the references to the IUS. (Do you know how to read a page history? You press the tab labled "View history"). I also was not the only one who reverted your edits. Please click on the instructional links in the Welcome section below (particularly WP:Contributing to Wikipedia), and learn the way we prefer to do things here, which is to look up WP:Reliable sources, take notes, and constructively add well-verified information, rather than just erasing info you don't like and arguing about it (WP:Edit warring). JustinTime55 (talk) 23:37, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

😂 okay I see. Thanks for finally adding the correct information. The information which was written earlier (payload to GTO=3810 kg) was incorrect and I was only removing the incorrect info in my edits. And my edits were repeatedly being reverted😐 Aakashmalik23122 (talk) 08:47, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Aakashmalik23122, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JustinTime55 (talk) 17:01, 31 January 2020 (UTC)