User talk:Aam1992/sandbox

=Evaluations=

Spelling/Grammar
Meets Expectations

Language
Nearly Meets Expectations If I was you I would use some sort of hedging on the sentence "It appears in all the social and political debates concerning religion in France," because it may be possible to find some political debate regarding religion in France that does not talk about laïcité. Saying something like 'It appears often in social and political debate concerning religion' is a sentence that reads more like I expect to see on Wikipedia, you don't often find hard stances there.

Organization
Meets Expectation. The paragraph looks like the other ones in the religion section on Wiki, but I would be interested to see how you would want to insert the paragraph into the module. This may help you get more points on organization.

Coding
Perfect

Validity
Meets standard. This information is cited and appears to all be valid.

Completion
Meets standard. This page has enough information to help add a full and sourced paragraph to the religion section for Paris.

Relevance
Meets standard. This information about laïcité all seems to be relevant to religion in Paris, and adds non redundant information to the existing section.

1/31/2018 Evaluation by Ledgepost2324
Ledgepost2324 (talk) 02:05, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Spelling/Grammar
Perfect spelling and grammar! Good.

Language
Perfect encyclopedic tone and diction Good.

Organization
Perfect paragraphs and headers Good.

Coding
Perfect code Good.

Validity
Solid information Good.

Completion
Complete Good.

Relevance
No irrelevant content Good.