User talk:Aam49516

November 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Islamic Society of Boston has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:53, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Islamic Society of Boston was changed by Aam49516 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.861974 on 2015-11-28T12:53:37+00:00.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Islamic Society of Boston with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.  Nott Nott  talk &#124;contrib 13:00, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Islamic Society of Boston with this edit, you may be blocked from editing.  Nott Nott  talk &#124;contrib 13:02, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

This is your final warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Islamic Society of Boston with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  Nott Nott  talk &#124;contrib 13:03, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently removing content from the article Islamic Society of Boston, with no attempt to explain why, and no response to messages from other editors about your actions. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:.

For the record, I'd like to point out that this user *did* explain why they were removing content from that article. They deleted a section of the article that I had asked about on its talk page -- I was suggesting that section should be deleted due to how long it was compared to its relevance - but I wasn't sure. Well, an anti-vandalism-bot reverted the edit - understandable since it was a whole-section-delete - but then Aam49516 put the edit back, and provided an edit summary that says "deleted this section. Islam has no ties to extremism." Well, I don't agree that Islam as a whole has no ties to extremism - Daesh/ISIS is extreme, (though of course I would agree that they aren't *really* Muslim, just like I'd argue that Christians who fight wars aren't *really* Christians, 'cause I'm a pacifist Christian and Jesus said love your enemies and all that...but I digress...) Anyway, point is, Aam49516 did indeed explain his content removal. So he shouldn't have been blocked. IMHO. However, it would have been helpful if you had responded to other editors, Aam49516. Let's talk!Megercliff (talk) 16:38, 28 November 2015 (UTC)