User talk:Aamat-webeditor

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emtrain (December 29)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.


 * Draft:Emtrain may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:EmtrainWeb Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:EmtrainWeb reviewer's talk page] . or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:50, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, club, organization, company, or website - I have blocked this account. Please take a moment to either create a new account, or request a change of username of your current account here. The new username must represent only yourself as an individual and comply with Wikipedia's username policy. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid, you must disclose who is paying you to edit. Please also note that you are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87". If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page. You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text   at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. Thank you. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:40, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Emtrain moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Emtrain, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – bradv 🍁  04:01, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Emtrain for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emtrain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Emtrain until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CNMall41 (talk) 19:05, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.  You appear to have a close connection to the subject on Wikipedia that raises concerns about a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged.

Anyone with a conflict of interest must avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing articles related to you, your family or colleagues, your organization or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam);
 * and you must always:
 * 1) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

Note that you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure. Even if you are not being paid, you are expected to disclose any close connection with the subject of the article, using the connected contributor template.

For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Conflict of Interest. Thank you. Deb (talk) 18:37, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

I thought this page was deleted. Was it? If not, would like to have the opportunity to improve on it to make it not come across as promotional.

Aamat-webeditor (talk) 02:04, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

January 2022
As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Aamat-webeditor, and the template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 13:48, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Added the mandatory paid editing disclosure to my user page, User:Aamat-webeditor Aamat-webeditor (talk) 17:29, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Please understand that Wikipedia is not a place for companies to tell the world about themselves and what they do.  That is considered promotional here, you don't have to be soliciting customers or selling something. A Wikipedia article must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the company- and not based on materials put out by the company or its associates like interviews/press releases/annoucements of routine activities- showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company.  Wikipedia is not interested in what a company says about itself, only in what others completely unconnected with the company have chosen to say about it.  In essence, you need to set aside everything you know about the company and only write based on the content of independent reliable sources. That's usually very difficult for those in your position to do, though not impossible. Please read Your First Article.
 * You and your company may want to understand that a Wikipedia article is not necessarily desirable. There are good reasons to not want one. 331dot (talk) 17:35, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Totally understood. We're working on a new draft with the above mentioned in mind. Of course, I'll be making sure to follow the procedures, edits, and the such to get it properly approved. Many thanks and will be posting the draft for review soon! Aamat-webeditor (talk) 18:56, 18 January 2022 (UTC)