User talk:Aamiller

Hello Aamiller and welcome to wikipedia! I see you are making important contributions for medical articles. Maybe you should take a look at the tyle conventions in the Manual of Style. I also formatted a few of your articles as an example. Have fun! Cheers, Muriel Gottrop 13:36 25 Jul 2003 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians in New Zealand
Hi, You might want to consider adding User NZ res to the top of your user page, which will add you to this category automatically and also add a nice graphic. Onco_p53 07:42, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Isocentric technique


A tag has been placed on Isocentric technique, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ryan Vesey (talk) 21:20, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Status and Advice
As reviewing administrator, I removed the speedy because this does not at all sound luke nonsense. But it needs considerable improvement to be an acceptable article. First, it must be more than a definition--it needs to be an explanation. Then,m the explanation must be accompanied and supported by references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. I advise you to fix the problem, and do this very quickly, before the article gets nominated for deletion by a regular deletion process.

I  urge you to write a proper article if it is possible; if it is not yet possible, please help us by improving our other articles on related topics.  DGG ( talk ) 22:08, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Isocentric technique for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Isocentric technique is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Isocentric technique until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ryan Vesey (talk) 04:22, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Isocentric technique


A tag has been placed on Isocentric technique, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:23, 4 June 2011 (UTC)