User talk:Aanubisu

AfD nomination of Lady Pink (r)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Lady Pink (r), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Lady Pink (r). Thank you. PhilKnight (talk) 13:47, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Deletion discussion for Lady Pink
Hi, regarding the above, notice that the main concern about Lady Pink (r) is the inability (it seems) to establish the notability of the product in verifiable reliable sources. The concern isn't that people think it doesn't exist, or that the information in the article would somehow be wrong or misleading, it's just that not everything which exists is "notable" (actually, there are totally different schools of thought on that but that's the one in policy at the moment).

Understanding the deletion process and the criterion for inclusion can be a bit difficult sometimes and unfortunatelly a lot of new editors who see an article they worked on deleted come away confused and even upset about it. While some "established" editors can be rude and even derisive, most of us try to be nice and not bite the noobies. Have a look at the following policy pages to get a better picture of how deletion works, what some of the criteria for inclusion are and what constitutes a "reliable" source for notability.


 * WP:Articles for Deletion - the main deletion page, contains process and links to alot of other pages on the topic.
 * WP:Criterion for Speedy Deletion - process for what articles can be removed without any discussion.
 * WP:Proposed Deletion - a simpler way to remove articles where deletion is not contested
 * WP:Deletion today - an overview of what is being discussed at the moment.
 * WP:Deletion Review - the place to discuss overturning a deletion of inclusion decision which may have violated process
 * WP:Notability - What should be in wikipedia? What shouldn't? Also notice that there are a number of sub pages.
 * WP:Verifiability - the most basic requirement for establishing notability
 * WP:Reliable Sources - a coverage of what sources are considered "good enough" for wikipedia.
 * WP:What Wikipedia is not - a list of things wikipedia isn't, to give an impression of what it is

Some other core wikipedia namespace stuff

 * WP:Policy - the central hub of policy in wikipedia
 * WP:Articles for Creation - AfC is the oppposite of the above. After un logged in users lost the right to create mainspace articles, AfC was created to allow them to create suggestions which could then be moved to mainspace. Generally, if something is moved from AfC, the guys there have made sure it won't just be deleted by seeing to the above.
 * WP:Request for Comment - RfC is basically a way of attracting other people to a discussion, often a content dipute, to try to establish a consensus before posting.

I hope this sheds some light on the quagmire that is the deletion process. I also wish you luck in your future editing. Usrnme h8er (talk · contribs) 08:47, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Ladypink.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ladypink.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:00, 21 February 2009 (UTC)