User talk:Aaoshi

Welcome!
Hello, Aaoshi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Thinker78 (talk) 23:13, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Fallacy has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:53, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message:(fixed) Fallacy was changed by Aaoshi (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.886944 on 2018-07-17T20:53:04+00:00.

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Linguistic prescription. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. On the other hand, if you think the maintenance called for is unnecessary, please explain why you think so at Talk:Linguistic prescription. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cnilep (talk) 06:55, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Active–stative language. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 22:52, 28 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia is written in the third person, in neutral language. See the Manual of Style. Donner60 (talk) 22:54, 28 July 2018 (UTC)


 * As further information, please see What Wikipedia is not and Verifiability. Wikipedia is not a forum, blog, soapbox, fan site or advice site. It is an encyclopedia based on reliable, verifiable, third-party sources. It does not publish rumors, personal opinions, commentary, advocacy, original research or unsourced information likely to be changed, challenged or disputed. See also Biographies of living persons, Five Pillars, Identifying reliable sources, Citing sources, Help:Footnotes, No original research, Manual of Style/Words to watch and Neutral point of view. For further information about contributing to Wikipedia, see: Referencing for beginners; Getting started; Introduction to Wikipedia; Simplified ruleset; Simplified Manual of Style; Help:Introduction to talk pages; Copyright Problems and Help:Contents. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 22:54, 28 July 2018 (UTC) your style guide is pointless and using the second-person pronoun is better than the "one" pronoun. I am just trying to fix that wrong.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Active–stative language, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Active–stative language was changed by Aaoshi (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.905352 on 2018-07-29T00:41:40+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:41, 29 July 2018 (UTC) what i am doing is not "vandalism" i am correcting a stupid style guide rule that shouldn't be followed

Your edits at Traditional grammar
Aaoshi, your recent edits at Traditional grammar apparently aimed to simplify the language used there. However, in doing that you changed the meaning of several sentences in inappropriate ways. For example, "object of a preposition" refers to a particular element in traditional grammar, which is not the same thing that "noun" refers to. Also, some of your changes actually introduced minor errors of grammar (for example, by removing an auxiliary verb) or usage (for example, by replacing a capital letter with a lower case one at the beginning of a sentence). I have therefore used the 'undo' function to reverse your edits.

I see that you have been warned about edits that others find disruptive. While I am sure that your contributions are made in good faith to improve Wikipedia as you see it, this is a collaborative effort. When editors disagree, they need to work together to find a consensus that all can agree to. One of my favored guidelines on this process is WP:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle, which describes the process through which editors are expected to establish consensus. Cnilep (talk) 00:42, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

fuck it, i give up. i tried to make this site better but i guess i can't. i'll just leave. :( — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aaoshi (talk • contribs) 02:44, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Don't leave, just be patient and learn how Wikipedia works, as we did. Thinker78 (talk) 06:26, 31 July 2018 (UTC)