User talk:Aaqib999

Your submission at Articles for creation: TicketsLot (February 24)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:TicketsLot and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:TicketsLot Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dodger67&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:TicketsLot reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:28, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Paid editing: disclosure is required
Hello Aaqib999. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Ticket resale, Electronic ticket, Tickets.com, Concert and Draft:TicketsLot. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a black hat practice. Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:   . If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. – Brianhe (talk) 10:05, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Spamming/Promotional editing
Hi there. I can't help but notice that you keep adding the same blog over and over again to articles, usually to no benefit to the actual article, as the content is already sourced by other sources. In addition to the fact that a "blogspot" like that is generally not going to meet the requirements of what Wikipedia considers to be a usable source, Wikipedia is not a place to promote a website. Spamming websites is not allowed. If this continues, you will be blocked from editing - your purpose here must be to build an Encyclopedia, not just promote your own interests. Thanks. Sergecross73  msg me  13:54, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:TicketsLot


Hello, Aaqib999. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "TicketsLot".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:27, 17 September 2016 (UTC)