User talk:Aardvarkzz

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Flowanda | Talk 07:33, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

List of films in the public domain in the United States
Thank you for your edits to this page! I think you are doing positive work on a page I have spent a lot of time working on. I looked at your User page (at User:Aardvarkzz) and it looks like you could use some advice. Your userpage can be seen by everyone, even by people who don't have Wikipedia accounts! I would not recommend putting sensitive or private information on your user page. I would stay away from giving your real name and where you live (saying which state you are from is fine, even city, if you live in a big place). Take a look at other people's user pages (here is mine: User:JEN9841) to see what other people use their user pages for.

The user page is where you can tell other Wikipedians about yourself, what types of articles you edit, and your general thoughts about Wikipedia. Technically anyone can edit someone's user page (unless its been protected), but it is common courtesy to not edit other people's user pages (its usually very much frowned upon; any outside edits would practically be vandalism). The pages you are allowed to edit are the user talk pages, which is the kind I am writing on now. My user talk page is at User talk:JEN9841). Feel free to make a new section on my user talk page to communicate with me.

Thank you again!

Also never forget to sign after you write on talk pages or discussion pages of articles with four tildes (~), as this signs your name with the date...it ends up looking like this: JEN9841 (talk) 07:00, 18 August 2009 (UTC)


 * It is superb to have an actual expert on the topic working on this page. As you can probably tell, I am no film expert, just a fan, and I think your position/opinion would take precedence over mine on anything with regards to this article.  If you see any film on this entry that is not in the public domain, please promptly remove it.  Also, you may have seen already on the talk page {Talk:List of films in the public domain in the United States}, but I removed a large amount of films that I could not find citations for and moved them to a subpage under my namespace, at User:JEN9841/List of films in the public domain.  With your added resources, if you can find a citation for them, it would be great to have them added back to this list as a film that is in the public domain. JEN9841 (talk) 16:29, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Bob King (editor)
You may disagree, but I'm not sure that this article meets guidelines for inclusion. Take a look at WP:NOTINHERITED. Just because he is the editor of two magazines does not automatically make him notable. The general notability guideline states that the subject must have "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Do feel this has been met? If so, please add sources and improve the article. Thanks. Jujutacular talkcontribs 00:40, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Table re-formatting of List of films in the public domain in the United States
Thank you for your concern with this article. While I still would prefer to change the article to a table under namespace and, once complete, move it to article space, the way it is currently being transerred, though not ideal in my opinion, is still acceptable. As for your concern about information in the table that is not directly relevant to a film's PD status, one of the most important aspects of having list articles (as opposed to mere categories) is that more information can be conveyed to the reader. This information, as you point out, may or may not be directly relevant to the subject of the article. Once the table is complete, unnecessary columns can be removed (it is a good idea to defer, at least initially, to have more columns than less, as it is much easier to remove something than add it later).

I have actually taken part in the transfer, as I have already moved all of the "B" titled films into table format. Your added information to the list was very helpful in putting the info in the table. If you like, you can also begin transferring the work into the table.JEN9841 (talk) 14:45, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Re: Your AIV report on 71.49.85.160
Thank you for your report on. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and you are encouraged to revert, warn and report inappropriate conduct. I have however declined to act on this report for the following reason:

That means they are most probably completely separate people.

The Guide to administrator intervention against vandalism might be a helpful read if you wish to improve your future reports. If you have further questions, please don't hesitate to ask me on my [ talk page]. Cheers! -- Luk  talk 06:50, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Unruly numbers of cats
If you want more cats, what is wrong with this edit? &mdash; RHaworth 23:50, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of The Irish Filmography
I have nominated The Irish Filmography, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/The Irish Filmography. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 19:58, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

And if you have a moment...
Inspired by your article, I have begun User:MichaelQSchmidt/sandbox/Kevin Rockett. Care to join in the fun?
 * Very happy you looked in. Thank you and Happy Holidays!  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 21:08, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Films January 2010 Newsletter
The January 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:40, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Judith Paige Mitchell
A tag has been placed on Judith Paige Mitchell requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Stroppolo talk 21:07, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, I did not see the Under Construction tag on the article. I removed the CSD tag. -- Stroppolo talk 21:09, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Films February 2010 Newsletter
The February 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:32, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Peter Graves (actor)
I noticed that you inserted a few references that were in the following form: "Obituary (name of publication as internal link) (date of publication)." I had to remove them because readers expect such references to be external links to the online form of the actual articles. Here's a few tips you might want to consider: (1) Find the actual article online. Make sure you collect the piece's ENTIRE web address (http://...). (2) When you're on the edit workpage of the entry you're attempting to alter, use the "" icon, which is the one at the far right above the text screen. Activating it will provide you with the basic format for references. Next, erase "Insert footnote text here" and tap the External links icon, which is fourth from the left with the planet Earth on it. This will automatically give you the proper format for you to type in the article's ENTIRE web address. (3) When you're finished editing, what needs to appear in the link name are the author's name (if available), the complete title of the article, the publication's name italicized and the date it appeared in print form (or the date it appeared online if the former is not expressed). Here's an example:

The only time I can think of when references aren't in the form of external links is when the text of the cited sources are not available online, such as actual books, publications from long time ago, match programs/magazines from sports entities, etc.

Please consult the information provided by Wikipedia because they are the ultimate authority on this matter and can explain everything better than I could. I, myself, have been the beneficiary of a few good tutorials from fellow editors. Your efforts in editing are appreciated because they make life a lot more easier for the rest of us. Best of luck in all future endeavors! The Ink Daddy! (talk) 02:55, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Reply from The Ink Daddy!
My first apology is having forgotten to sign my previous comment above. It was purely accidental. I guess I was too preoccupied with NCAA Division I Men's Basketball tournament brackets, filling out the Census form, doing research on my book, etc.

I checked throughout Wikipedia to find the information relevant to this dilemna and found it in Inline citation. First, you are correct that there are no strict requirements for using them. Second, you make an outstanding point that lots of external links go dead after a certain period of time. This is especially true with articles from Tribune Company-owned newspapers, which pains me greatly because I'm a reader of The Baltimore Sun. One exception is The New York Times, whose articles have some staying power, except for the ones from the 1960s through the early-1980s which have a price tag attached to them.

I was thinking along the lines of how to best serve the readers of Wikipedia. I strongly feel that it is important for the entries to be as informative and professional-looking as possible, considering that Wikipedia's reputation is always being questioned. By no means was I trying to be condescending.

I was originally going to comment on the contentious nature of your correspondence, but I remembered that I was exactly like that when I started, and boy do I regret it. Then again, I guess it's all part of the learning process. I do respect you for challenging my comments & actions because it forced me to learn more about the details behind Wikipedia.

What you were doing was correct, and I apologize for my actions. Just as a modest suggestion, you might want to mention the author's name and the exact title of the article in your references, too. Just a modest suggestion. The Ink Daddy! (talk) 02:55, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Template:Recent death
Hi. Please see the template instructions for recent death. The template is not supposed to be used on every biography of recently deceased individuals. Only on very heavily edited articles. Rettetast (talk) 20:00, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Films March 2010 Newsletter
The March 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:43, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Chris Limahelu
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Chris Limahelu, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://articles.latimes.com/2010/apr/07/local/la-me-passings8-2010apr08. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:58, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

WP:FILMS April Newsletter
The April 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 22:44, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of The Man Outside (disambiguation)
I have nominated The Man Outside (disambiguation), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/The Man Outside (disambiguation). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Airplaneman  ✈  01:32, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

May 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Man Outside (disambiguation). Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:21, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

WP:FILMS May 2010 Newsletter
The May 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:49, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Just to let you know....
An article you had written May 2, 2010 about USC Trojans place kicker Chris Limahelu was proposed for deletion on May 5, and subsequently deleted. I learned this due to the redlinks that then appeared elsewhere. In discussions with admin User:Nihiltres I had it userfied to a workspace so I might expand and further source it. I have now returned it to mainspace and have nominated it for a DYK. A nice beginning. I was glad to be able to bring it back to life. Best,  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 02:24, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

WP:FILMS June 2010 Newsletter
The June 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:28, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

WP:FILMS July 2010 Newsletter
The July 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:55, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Man Outside (disambiguation)
Hey Aardvarkzz, I was sifting through my contributions and noticed this AFD I filed a few months ago. I came by to say that I have learned since then to not tag articles so early :). Sorry about that. Anyway, I wasn't pleased to be called a "BUSYBODY" either. Ugh. I donate tons of my time here and that's the last thing I want. Oh well. Could you also point me to the "one hour policy" you were referring to? Thanks, and no hard feelings, Airplaneman   ✈  00:01, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
 * You can find that advice at New pages patrol, where it states
 * Especially if the new article has a newpage, inuse, or underconstruction template showing, care should be taken to ensure that the author has finished the initial version before you evaluate the page. A good rule of thumb is to wait until at least 15 minutes after the last edit before tagging the article (or up to an hour for the newpage tag).
 * I also suggest you read Give an article a chance.Aardvarkzz (talk) 20:52, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking the time to respond. I have read the links. Take care, Airplaneman   ✈  21:29, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

License tagging for File:The Irish Filmography 300px wide.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Irish Filmography 300px wide.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:06, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Irish Filmography.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:The Irish Filmography.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 04:53, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:The Irish Filmography 300px wide.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:The Irish Filmography 300px wide.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 04:55, 23 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia's volumes of rules and scads of related tags are not clear or obvious. I used one image sent to me the owner at my request, and suddenly I have five warning messages. Based on the Summary and Licensing with other books on Wikipedia, as well as permission from the copyright owner, I have supplied what I hope will be acceptable to Wikipedia. If there is some technical conflict with what is acceptable, please correct it for me so I will know what to do in the future.


 * The_Irish_Filmography.jpg is too large. You can delete it. The Irish Filmography 300px wide.jpg That's the one to keep.Aardvarkzz (talk) 07:55, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:The Irish Filmography.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:The Irish Filmography.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:20, 24 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 05:20, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Variety cites
Please don't just stick a plain cite to Variety obits into article WP:LEADs. If the cite supports something in the article, put a compelete cite there with a page number and perhaps a relevant quote. -- Ssilvers (talk) 03:08, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree that page numbers and items from the obituaries would be worthwhile additions. However, the sources I'm using don't have the original page numbers readily available. Quoting from the obits is something I intend to add later. If you want to quote from the obits now, that will be a welcome contribution. Email me if you need help finding the source material.Aardvarkzz (talk) 04:13, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi. Thanks for the message. You wrote: "...VARIETY OBITS: An Index to Obituaries in Variety by Jeb H. Perry. It ends at June 21, 1978, so I’ve used it to put in some page numbers. I’ll go back later to fill in some I missed."

Thanks. But please note that a bare citation, while helpful, is not as useful as a *discussion* of what the obit says. If the obit discusses this person's life, tell us what the obit says, and if there are any interesting quotes, you can quote them. For an excellent celebrity Biography article that uses sources well, see, for example, Noel Coward.

You also wrote: "After I made my initial reply to you on my userpage, did the notice "You have new messages (last change)" appear to you the next time you logged in?  ... advise me how to notify someone that I have replied to them on my user page....

No, because I do not watch your talk page. The best way to reply to someone is on their talk page. You can copy the message on your talk page also if you want to retain the conversation all in one place. Best regards! -- Ssilvers (talk) 17:05, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Notice of discussion re: potential linkspam to "Variety"
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 07:40, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

WP:FILMS August 2010 Newsletter
The August 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:47, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

WP:FILM September Election Nomination Period Open
The September 2010 project coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting five coordinators from a pool of candidates to serve for the next year; all members are invited to nominate themselves if interested. Please do not vote yet, voting will begin on September 15. This message has been sent as you are registered as an active member of the project. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:40, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Explantion requested for wikilinking
As you are adding numerous links to the articles, Harrison's Reports and Variety, two multi-volume directories mostly found in large cinema and history collections, can you please explain how they can be useful to these many articles? You are also putting them in the leads of bios and film articles, en masse, despite preexisting reliable sources and obituary cites. Clicking on your citation-link simply takes the reader to another article about the directories themselves, nothing more. Can you please explain your rationale? Thanks. --Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 19:51, 3 September 2010 (UTC)


 * "I ask you to instruct User: Wikiwatcher1 to tolerate their presence in articles about movies and celebrities." That's not how this kind of thing works. It looks like you're adding extraneous references to articles. Why are you doing that? If the information is already verified (remember that leads don't need citations if they draw on verified material in the rest of the article), then adding citations to your pet references is pointless make-work. If those references actually have new information, then by all means add it to the articles and use a reference, but don't add hundreds or thousands of references to articles just for the sake of it. Fences  &amp;  Windows  23:33, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Wikibooks, Wikimania, etc.
You are aware that Wikimedia foundation is behind these site just like it is behind wikipedia? Weaponbb7 (talk) 15:17, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

WP:FILMS September 2010 Newsletter
The September 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:14, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Categories
Please do not add religious categories without verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Loretta Young. Thank you. Span (talk) 23:09, 12 October 2010 (UTC)


 * First, WHY do you disguise your user name as "Span" when you are, in fact, User:Spanglej. And WHAT is your reference for Loretta Young's religion? Other than people of the Catholic clergy, there cannot be more than five Americans better known to have been Catholic than Loretta, as I am certain you will learn if you bother to read any biography of her. The Catholic religion was more important to Loretta than virtually anything else in her life. As for the recently-deceased John F. Sullivan, I included a reference to his Baltimore Sun obituary. READ that obituary and you will agree that he was Catholic.


 * I have undone your disruptive editing deletions of the Category:American Roman Catholics for Young and Sullivan -- you deleted them again. This is fair warning that if I encounter any further such disruptive editing by you, I will post a complaint against you with Wikipedia.Aardvarkzz (talk) 20:56, 14 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Firstly, in response, my name is not a disguise, it a signature, see Signatures. Secondly, Wikipedia in an international resource. Many users, including myself, are not American. As a long standing editor, you will know that Wikipedia is based on five key guidelines which include Verifiability. This says: "the burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material." No source of religious practice is given in the article for Loretta Young. The cited obituary in the Baltimore Sun for John F. Sullivan gave no link to the article. No mention of his religion or religious citation is mentioned in the article itself. I have since added this. It is often useful to assume the good faith of other editors. The request to add sources is a standard, civil Wikipedia procedure. You are very welcome to make a complaint against me if moved or join the on-going discussion of category citation at Category talk:American Roman Catholics. Thank you Span (talk) 00:05, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Loretta Young
Hi. In the future, please do not re-add categories regarding religion without citing a reliable source as you did here. I've no idea what discussion you're referring to in that edit summary which supposedly supports its inclusion and I suspect other editors would not as well. Regardless, a talk page discussion is not a reliable source and cannot be verified which is what is needed for such categories. I went ahead and added sources for it along with a brief mention of Young's religion in the text which is what the above editor was basically asking for. Thank you.  Pinkadelica ♣  00:48, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

WP:FILM October 2010 Newsletter
The Octoberr 2010 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 00:37, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

WP:FILM November 2010 Newsletter
The November 2010 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:50, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

WP:FILM December 2010 Newsletter
The December 2010 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:59, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM January 2011 Newsletter
The January 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:09, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Kyron
FYI - I have started a new article, Disappearance of Kyron Horman, which you may be interested in since you voted to keep Kyron Horman in the last AfD. I believe that an article about the event itself would not fail WP:BLP1E like the original biographical article on the victim did. There is a ton of coverage, so sources are not a problem. Feel free to add to the article if you like. Thanks! Snotty Wong  prattle 23:21, 1 February 2011 (UTC)


 * I’m glad that someone has restored a page on this highly publicized case. There are people in the Wikipedia hierarchy that have a penchant for deleting pages on all but the most famous kidnap-murder victims, even those cases receiving widespread reportage. You appear to have started from scratch, even though there was lots of material in the previous article. Possibly it is unwise to ask the administrator who deleted that article to restore the material someplace where you can selectively add it back to your new article, as that administrator might delete your new article; if that’s not a problem, then why not ask? Possibly you remember the case of Somer Thompson, who was kidnapped and murdered in 2009; her page was deleted too, despite lots of articles about her and her murderer. How does one go about appealing the unwarranted deletion of such articles?Aardvarkzz (talk) 00:09, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The original article was deleted because the subject of the article was Kyron himself, i.e. it was a biography of Kyron. Since Kyron is only notable for one event, he falls under WP:BLP1E.  I'm attempting to sidestep that problem by creating an article on the event of his disappearance, which as as you know has been highly publicized nationally.  I have actually already gotten the deleted version of the article emailed to me, although that version wasn't terribly long and didn't have much more in it than what I created from scratch.  I added a few things from it but mostly didn't use it.  Regarding your question about appealing the unwarranted deletion of articles: Deletion review (DRV) is the place for that.  For articles that have been deleted a long time ago (especially if circumstances have changed), you can usually just re-create the article without first asking permission at DRV.  Snotty Wong   spill the beans 00:47, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM February 2011 Newsletter
The February 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:08, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM March 2011 Newsletter
The March 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 21:06, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM April 2011 Newsletter
The April 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 22:34, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM May 2011 Newsletter
The May 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 01:37, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM June 2011 Newsletter
The June 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. We are also seeking new members to assist in writing the newsletter, if interested please leave a note on the Outreach department's talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:28, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM July 2011 Newsletter
The July 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. We are also seeking new members to assist in writing the newsletter, if interested please leave a note on the Outreach department's talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:28, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM September 2011 Newsletter
The September 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 16:35, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

2011 WikiProject Film coordinator election
Voting for WikiProject Film's October 2011 project coordinator election has started. We are aiming to select five coordinators to serve for the next year; please take a moment from editing to vote here by October 29! Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 11:55, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM October 2011 Newsletter
The October 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 15:00, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Film November 2011 Newsletter
The  2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Peppage (talk &#124; contribs) 22:35, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Eureka Stockade 1949.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Eureka Stockade 1949.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 07:04, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Doe Avedon, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Model and Jigsaw (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Film December 2011 Newsletter
The December 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Peppage (talk &#124; contribs) 22:00, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Richard Sylbert, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unconditional Love (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Film's January–February Newsletter
The January 2012 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

To unsubscribe, please remove your name from the distribution list. GRAPPLE  X  00:35, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Richard Sylbert, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tequila Sunrise and Shoot to Kill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:05, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Steffi Sidney for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steffi Sidney is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Steffi Sidney until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 18:35, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite
Hi. The WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 01:57, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!