User talk:Aarem/Archive 6

Edits statistics till February 2007

 * 1) Category: 16
 * 2) Image: 79
 * 3) Mainspace 1002
 * 4) Portal talk: 1
 * 5) Portal: 14
 * 6) Talk: 105
 * 7) Template: 28
 * 8) User talk: 182
 * 9) User: 24
 * 10) Wikipedia talk: 1
 * 11) Wikipedia: 54
 * 12) Earliest Edit : 13:37, 14 June 2006
 * 13) Number of unique pages : 466
 * 14) Total : 1506

thanks for support
but I really dont find a method to make my signature. Could you please be more in description?

Vijesh —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vijeshchandran (talk • contribs) 11:27, 16 March 2007 (UTC).

fine
this explanation sounds good to me. i have updated my signature column and hope i can see it next time when I edited those pages.

--Vijesh 15:46, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 20th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:25, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

TIs
i cant believe u delete everything i write on TIs. Its not advertisiing, infact its giving info about the school. Find another topic to delete stuff from. Have you been to TIs? Can you say anything about it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.88.237.79 (talk • contribs)

JNURM
Hi Rajith, Do you have the JNURM details ? If so, kindly share. --Samaleks 16:09, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Chalachitra Academy
Hi Rajith, I noticed that there is a request for a new article on Chalachitra Academy, in the Kerala Portal. Hope you can contribute. The details can be taken from the KFDC web site too. Thanks in advance --Samaleks 16:12, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Priyan.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Priyan.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 08:07, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 26th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 14:18, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

hiya...according to imdb mammootty's dob is 1951 now..so hope u wont change it drom now on..thank u

TVM
Please see this and this  Jisha  (Talk)  09:15, 31 March 2007 (UTC)


 * No worries! Great work on the Technopark article!--Jisha  (Talk) 07:10, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Hello Rajith

someone renamed the name of Thiruvananthapuram. Please rename it back... I couldnt do it...

Bala —Preceding unsigned comment added by Balagopal.k (talk • contribs)

Signpost updated for April 2nd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:13, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Re:TFA/R
Hi,

There are many reasons for non-approval of TRA/R. The most common one is that articles are so chosen that they don't over-represent a broad topic. For example, Technopark is India-related article. The IIT Kharagpur's article came on the front page on 16th March. This means it was just two-and-half weeks away. Also note that Ziaur Rehman's article came on the front page on 2nd April. Although not directly related to India, the article is still related to sub-continent. You can also consider Cleveland article as one of the culprits. It appeared on the front page on 29th March, and just like Technopark, it is a "Geography and Places" article. Hope you understand how difficult it is for Raul to schedule the articles when so many things have to be kept in mind. There is no formula for success. If the date that you request is significant for the article, there is a better chance of getting selected on that day. Otherwise there are so many issues that you can never be sure that the article would be scheduled. Hope this was helpful. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 19:37, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 9th, 2007.
Special note to spamlist users: Apologies for the formatting issues in previous issues. This only recently became a problem due to a change in HTML Tidy; however, I am to blame on this issue. Sorry, and all messages from this one forward should be fine (I hope!) -Ral315

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:19, 10 April 2007 (UTC)