User talk:AaronLPQ

November collaboration
Hi there. We need more votes to determine which article we gonna collaborate on for November. So please vote. And can you add your name to the list of project members so its easier to locate all participants. Thanks! White2020 (talk) 07:58, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Malaysian Population Clock
Please read the full editor's entry for Malaysia on the List of countries by population page. The Malaysian population clock at http://www.statistics.gov.my uses incorrect coding & resets population the first of every month. It used to reset population to 27,452,091. I contacted them, but no reply. New page there now resets to about 27,718,800 first of each month. The pop clock there is worthless -- There is NO reason to think any of the figures are valid for anything. -- JimWae (talk) 19:34, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

December 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article First Avenue Mall, please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 03:51, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of SJK(C) Han Chiang


The article SJK(C) Han Chiang has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable primary school

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 03:53, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Han Chiang High School


The article Han Chiang High School has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Notability not established (primary school)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 03:56, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

April 2010
Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to SJK(C) Han Chiang. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 09:55, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 09:55, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of First Avenue Mall


The article First Avenue Mall has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Notability not established, unsourced and most likely WP:OR

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 08:20, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Antony Selvanayagam
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Antony Selvanayagam. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Antony Selvanayagam


The article Antony Selvanayagam has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Rettetast (talk) 08:45, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Padang Kota Lama
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Padang Kota Lama, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.penang-traveltips.com/padang-kota-lama.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:40, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Padang Kota Lama
A tag has been placed on Padang Kota Lama requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thorncrag   06:48, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Church of the Holy Name of Jesus, Penang


The article Church of the Holy Name of Jesus, Penang has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Sounds like an average and nonnotable church. Wikipedia is not a directory of every church in the world. Appears to fails WP:ORG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Edison (talk) 16:10, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I see that you have been creating articles about individual churches. Not every church satisfies WP:ORG, the applicable notability standard. Some time ago, there was a (failed) notability guide for religious congregations and their buildings called WP:CONG. It can still provide some ideas for things to look for that are useful in establishing the notability of a given church. Wikipedians are wary of someone establishing a page to advertise their organization. Wikipedia is Edison (talk) 16:20, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Taiping Catholic Church


The article Taiping Catholic Church has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Does not appear to satisfy WP:ORG, the guideline for notability. Wikipedia is not a directory of every church in the world.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Edison (talk) 16:24, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Church of St. Michael, Ipoh


The article Church of St. Michael, Ipoh has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Does not appear to satisfy WP:ORG, the guideline for notability. Wikipedia is not a directory of every church in the world.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Edison (talk) 16:25, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of ÆON Bukit Indah Shopping Centre


The article ÆON Bukit Indah Shopping Centre has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable mall lacks significant RS coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 06:50, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Catholic-Hierarchy.org
Hello. I noticed that you have edited a number of articles on Catholicism. A discussion is taking place as to whether the website Catholic-Hierarchy.org is a reliable source that can be utilized on Wikipedia or whether all references and information derived from it should be deleted. This topic is currently being discussed at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard. As the website's removal as a reference will affect several thousand Wikipedia articles, I believe that the broadest range of opinions should be obtained before action is taken. Please contribute if interested.Patapsco913 (talk) 22:07, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Han Chiang Indoor Stadium for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Han Chiang Indoor Stadium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Han Chiang Indoor Stadium until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kharkiv07 ( T ) 21:24, 6 July 2016 (UTC)