User talk:AaronN322

Your blog articles are not a reliable source
Please read WP:BLOGS and WP:Reliable sources about why you should not be using your own blog as a source. If you have access to the reliable sources that you used to write your blog, then these would be the sources that you cite, not your blog. Thanks. — billinghurst  sDrewth  06:58, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Re: Self-published sources
I think you need to take a better look at the link you posted yourself: WP:BLOGS

"Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced by an established expert on the subject matter, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable third-party publications."

I have been published about pinfire cartridges and similar gun and ammunition related things dozens of times in multiple journals articles and books by multiple people. I have worked with multiple crime labs across the country. I am a director in the International Ammunition Association. I would clearly call myself THE "established expert on the subject matter" of pinfire cartridges.

I AM the source on these. You can not cite a physical object or a document. You can however cite a section of a website that shows the cartridge box and cartridges made by a manufacturer.

Stop thinking you know anything about something you clearly do not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AaronN322 (talk • contribs) 14:10, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello AaronN322, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Ethan Allen (armsmaker) have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:06, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Lefaucheux Museum for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lefaucheux Museum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lefaucheux Museum until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. toweli (talk) 06:06, 2 June 2024 (UTC)