User talk:Aaron boucher

June 2009
Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors. And in particular, for comments such as this  freshacconci  talk talk  20:27, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Nice the way you place tags on people's pages for simply disagreeing with you. What you did and the way you did it was totally under-handed. And you did it to my wife. I will never forget you. --Aaron boucher (talk) 06:22, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Scarmudgeon for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.  freshacconci  talk talk  20:33, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.  freshacconci  talk talk  21:23, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

The time to use the talk page to discuss edits was long before you and your sock puppet made massive wholesale deletions to a page that had survived many challenges. You dug up every trick in the book to find a way to screw up my wife's work without actually asking the person(s) who wrote it, you piece of garbage. I have no words to describe you...so I'll just say you are a coward. --Aaron boucher (talk) 06:23, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Aaron, civility is an important part of editing at Wikipedia. Personal attacks such as you have written are not tolerated here and I strongly suggest you refrain in future. I also suggest that you read about reliable sources re: the Endless Ages page. Blogs, youtube, forums etc... are mostly not accounted reliable and cannot be used to substantiate material here. - Peripitus (Talk) 10:38, 24 June 2009 (UTC)