User talk:Aaronmacarthy

Speedy deletion nomination of The pond analogy


A tag has been placed on The pond analogy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template  to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. M.BEGG (talk) 17:26, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

The pond analogy
your recent edit to The pond analogy appears to be un constructive and has therefore been reverted.M.Begg (talk) 16:19, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The pond analogy


The article The pond analogy has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No information on tim brunt or the pond analogy on wikipedia or google and its a very short article with no links or information

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. M.Begg (talk) 13:56, 16 October 2010 (UTC)