User talk:Aarzoo Shah

June 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Harshad Chopda has been reverted. Your edit here to Harshad Chopda was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.twitter.com/chopdaharshad/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 15:44, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Naina Singh moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Naina Singh, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. New articles generally need at least two (but preferably more) references from reliable sources that are independent of the subject that discuss the subject with significant coverage (trivial mentions do not contribute to notability).(See Rule 42) Information that can't be referenced to reliable sources should be removed from the draft because verifiability is necessary for information added to Wikipedia. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of  before the article title) where you can work on the article with minimal disruption from other users while you improve it. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready to be published, you can move it back to the article space yourself. However, I recommend that instead of moving it yourself that you follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template that I have added to the page. This submits the article to be reviewed by experienced editors that specialize in helping new editors write their first articles. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  13:40, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Unjustified reversion
Hi there, re: this edit where you restored unsourced content, I think I made it fairly clear in my edit summary as well as with the embedded text that a birthdate must be sourced, otherwise it violates WP:BLPPRIVACY. You should familiarise yourself with that guideline. All content about living persons must be impeccably sourced per WP:BLP. Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:22, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

WP:TVCAST
Hi there, it would be appreciated if you'd please refrain from renaming the Recurring TV cast section "Supporting" as you did here. "Supporting" is far too wide a net for a cast section, as it could include anybody in the cast. In contrast, "Recurring" highlights significant recurring roles. Wikipedia is not IMDb, so we need to be more selective about the content we are including. Please note WP:TVCAST, which represents community preference on the matter. If for whatever reason you think that Bepannah should have a local exception to established community consensus, you would have to open a discussion at Talk:Bepannah to seek consensus for the new change. Frankly, I don't think it's worth your time. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:10, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Talkback
I would urge you to justify your reversion at this article. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:20, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Future projects
Hi, as per our guidelines at WP:FILMOGRAPHY we "do not add future projects until filming has begun". Thank you! Krimuk2.0 (talk) 14:15, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Naina Singh for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Naina Singh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Naina Singh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ─ The Aafī   (talk)|undefined  09:05, 25 November 2021 (UTC)