User talk:Aathies

July 2014
Hello, I'm Mophedd. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Mophedd (talk) 21:02, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rape (county subdivision). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Mophedd (talk) 21:14, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:41, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Why would we decrease the period of time? Take the WP:STANDARDOFFER. Origamiteis out right now 18:31, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

To [Mophedd] :My talk page is my talk page and I do not intend on using it to further any vandalism. Don't try to restrict me even more just because you don't like me. That's very unprofessional. Nice try. Aathies (talk) 20:51, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Mophedd, yes, I really don't care that you removed my comment because it was sarcastic. There was no confusion. I just felt like you needed to know that your self-righteousness in monitoring my page for potential vandalism is unneeded, unless you like wasting your time. Go ahead and continue to get off on attempting to block me from editing my own page. I'm doing nothing wrong on here. Keep to yourself, bud. Aathies (talk) 21:24, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
 * To Aathies, you are correct. Your talk page is your own. So is mine, however. That's why I removed YOUR comment from MY talk page. A quick glance at the page history will confirm this. I sincerely hope this clears up any confusion. Cheers, Mophedd (talk) 21:19, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Mophedd, you requested that my talk page be semi-protected because you say I am "only using it to further [my] vandalism". What can one deduce from that other than you trying to have me unable to edit my own talk page (which is completely inappropriate)? I know you don't have the authority, as you shouldn't, but evidence of desire is there, and that is why I am a bit miffed at you. And restricting means, in the context I used it, that you are attempting to restrict me from editing my own talk page through a higher authority, as I said before. And I am aware you didn't block me, Bongwarrior did. My main point is that you claimed that I am only using my talk page to continue vandalizing, which is completely absurd to even consider. Please, when you make a claim, actually have it be true and provable. Aathies (talk) 22:24, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
 * To Aathies, In no way am I attempting to block you from editing your own talk page. I don't have the desire or authority. Nor have I seen you vandalize your own talk page. Your page is on my watchlist because I edited it, pure and simple. That being said, I didn't block you, I simply reverted your vandalizing edits to an article (your FIRST 14), warned you (twice), and requested page protection (as my contribs will confirm). Trying to blame me won't work, considering that page histories are there for all to see. BTW, you accused me of "restricting" you (whatever that means) BEFORE I made this comment and the one above. That doesn't parse. Mophedd (talk) 22:12, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Mophedd, well, all apologies are acceptable, at least in this matter. Don't contact me again.
 * To Aathies, my apologies. Looking again, I did send a request for page protection for your user talk. Perhaps I was wrong or hasty to do that (I WAS a bit angry). For what it's worth, I'm sorry. Mophedd (talk) 22:30, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

To Daniel Case: My apologies for two appeals open at once, but I would still like the one below the superseding one reviewed, as I am still making a very honest and true attempt at proving myself a helpful member of the Wikipedia community.