User talk:Aawjgnekr

November 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Stonewall Jackson, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 23:58, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Stonewall Jackson constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. L Kensington (talk • contribs) 00:00, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Charles Lindbergh. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. L Kensington (talk • contribs) 00:06, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Haiku. L Kensington (talk • contribs) 00:11, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Chase Oliver


Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Access Denied –  talk to me  00:39, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Controlisable


The article Controlisable has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable neologism.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Guoguo12 --Talk--  00:45, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — GorillaWarfare talk 00:54, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Controlisable for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Controlisable, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Controlisable until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Access Denied –  talk to me  00:57, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Aawjgnekr for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. bonadea contributions talk 17:25, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Aawjgnekr for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. bonadea contributions talk 11:48, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Aawjgnekr for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Man way  09:22, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

AN notice
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Darth Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 00:38, 5 March 2012 (UTC)