User talk:Aayat1998

Proposed deletion of Amit Khanna (photographer)
Hello, Aayat1998. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Amit Khanna (photographer), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Coderzombie (talk) 11:06, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ishika Taneja


A tag has been placed on Ishika Taneja, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Uncle Roy (talk) 14:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Miss Multinational


A tag has been placed on Miss Multinational requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. -★- PlyrStar93. → Message me. ← 19:36, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
Hello, I'm Richie Campbell. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of beauty pageants have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Richie Campbell (talk) 02:49, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Trampton (talk) 21:43, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Nikhil Anand for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nikhil Anand is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nikhil Anand until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:13, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nikhil Anand


A tag has been placed on Nikhil Anand, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 00:15, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Sophia Senoron for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sophia Senoron is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sophia Senoron until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hitro talk 09:52, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Ankita Kumari for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ankita Kumari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ankita Kumari until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hitro talk 10:09, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Miss Multinational for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Multinational is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Miss Multinational until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:27, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Re: Glamanand Supermodel India 2018
Hello Aayat1998 I have added projects India, Beauty Pageants, Fashion, to your article. You may wish to join them, check their to-do, and meet new people with interest in these topics. Cheers, --Gryllida (talk) 19:41, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Miss Multinational 2019 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Multinational 2019 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Miss Multinational 2019 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Huon (talk) 15:00, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nikhil Anand


A tag has been placed on Nikhil Anand requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSA talk   12:58, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Miss Multinational 2018 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Multinational 2018 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Miss Multinational 2018 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Richie Campbell (talk) 14:48, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Miss Multinational for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Multinational is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Miss Multinational& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Richie Campbell (talk) 14:50, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Vridhi Jain for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vridhi Jain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Vridhi Jain until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 20:18, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Vridhi Jain. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I  Talk to my owner :Online 11:24, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Glamanand Group moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Glamanand Group, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Sulfurboy (talk) 08:15, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Miss Teen World
Hello Aayat1998, I deleted your edits, because this was not the right way. The reasons are: No source for the name change -> article name is binding and you deleted the whole infobox. If the article name is wrong, you must create a new article with the correct name (please use good sources), after then you create a redirect on Miss Teen World to the new name. Regards --Serols (talk) 07:13, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello Serols, kindly go through the recent changes that have been done. Miss Teen World is the brand owned by Miss World Organization. However, people from Equador have tried to steal the brand name by copying the names. The same content also is available on Miss Teenager World. Please note that these are two different titles. Miss Teen World has officially happened for several years and later it was renamed to Miss Teen COntinents. If we cannot let it be on the name Miss Teen WOrld then the false information and fake claims by Rodrigo Morreira can also not be allowed. I have observed that he tried to claim the Wikipedia pages of Miss Teen International, Miss Teen Intercontinental, Miss Teen Supranational, Miss Teen Universe, and now he has jumped on Miss Teen world. Wikipedia is the information source to millions of people and I strongly believe that we should not allow false information. I would recommend to let the article be like it happened for several years and the pageant in such name was discontinued due to legal issues.Aayat1998 (talk) 11:08, 15 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello Aayat1998, thank you for the information. But that does not change the procedure -> article name is binding. You cannot give this article a different name in the text and delete the infobox. Regards --Serols (talk) 12:36, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Then I think it will be appropriate to mention that the pageant was discontinued and the name was changed. The name shall be used again when Miss World organization resumes the pageant. The current information on the page is misleading and promotional. Aayat1998 (talk)

Your draft article, Draft:Glamanand Group


Hello, Aayat1998. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Glamanand Group".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:14, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Inappropriate speedy deletion nominations
I am not sure what it is you're trying to do with edits like this one:, but you have now nominated that page for speedy deletion three times. If this should happen once again, you will likely be blocked for disruptive editing. The article has already been kept at an AfD discussion, and so is not eligible for speedy deletion. If you think the article should be deleted, then you can make your case for that at a new AfD discussion, but knock off the speedy nominations. If a speedy is declined, don't try it again, take it to AfD. Seraphimblade Talk to me 01:45, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

seraphim lade my only concern to nominate the article for deletion was the reason of using the same pageant name for various pageants. Even Miss Teen World page has been purposely acquired by the same people. I appreciate your valuable feedback and what should I be avoiding in future. I am not as experienced as you. I will take care of disruptive editing.

I found out that a group of people who have created or edited the articles related to the organization based in Equador, most of their accounts have been deleted or banned for various reasons.

I'll create an AfD discussion. Aayat1998 (talk) 02:11, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

seraphimblade my only concern to nominate the article for deletion was the reason of using the same pageant name for various pageants. Even Miss Teen World page has been purposely acquired by the same people. I appreciate your valuable feedback and what should I be avoiding in future. I am not as experienced as you. I will take care of disruptive editing.

I found out that a group of people who have created or edited the articles related to the organization based in Equador, most of their accounts have been deleted or banned for various reasons.

I'll create an AfD discussion.Aayat1998 (talk) 02:13, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ritika Khatnani


A tag has been placed on Ritika Khatnani requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:15, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Ritika Khatnani has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ritika Khatnani. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 13:24, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

ANI Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk</i> 16:04, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

<b style="color: Blue;">Canterbury Tail</b> I really need your help regarding Miss Teen International pages. It is to be noticed that The pageant based in Equador started in 2019 after its growing popularity in India. Moreover, if you notice, Miss Teen International pages have been hugely edited from Ecuador to establish the presence in their name. Their page which states Americas claims to have all the history to their own without stating the actual year of their own establishment. The another page of Miss Teen International based in India also shared the same information to have transparency but the user keeps changing it and destroying the article. The USA also has Miss Teen International trademark and hence it cannot be claimed as Americas. The user yahsabaot clearly removed all their information to establish their presence. --Aayat1998 (talk) 16:19, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
 * The discussion on ANI located here is the best source for this discussion now. <b style="color: Blue;">Canterbury Tail</b> <i style="color: Blue;">talk</i> 16:32, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

3RR
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. <b style="color: Blue;">Canterbury Tail</b> <i style="color: Blue;">talk</i> 16:05, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

I understand that there's been repetitive destruction of the Wikipedia pages of Miss Teen International by a person based in Ecuador. He removed all the sources and details of the pageant's presence across the world. I request to kindly help me secure the information on the page. The person claims everything under his name. --Aayat1998 (talk) 16:08, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Please take that to the ANI thread that has been opened for this discussion. <b style="color: Blue;">Canterbury Tail</b> <i style="color: Blue;">talk</i> 16:13, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Blocked
<div class="user-block uw-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px"> You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. <b style="color: Blue;">Canterbury Tail</b> <i style="color: Blue;">talk</i> 16:36, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)