User talk:Aayush12233

Placenames
Please stop changing the names of places in our articles, to different names to those used as our article titles, as you did at Kumbh Mela. We use the Common names in English for our articles, not the "Official names", so changing the name breaks internal links to those articles, and is confusing to our readers - thank you - Arjayay (talk) 15:57, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Why? Allahabad is no longer Allahabad. It's now Prayagraj which is more common for us hindus. So, you don't have right to revert back again and again. Stop reverting this. Aayush12233 (talk) 16:10, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
 * The reasons are clearly explained above, and in the blue-linked articles - Arjayay (talk) 16:24, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kumbh Mela, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 16:24, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

How can you prove that Allahabad is common name than Prayagraj? Aayush12233 (talk) 16:26, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Prayagraj is rather more common for us hindus than Allahabad. That's why I and possibly many others felt confused while reading the word Allahabad in Kumbh Mela article. As said by you, it is confusing for readers, so the readers are getting confusing by your editing rather than mine. Aayush12233 (talk) 16:29, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

By changing the word Prayagraj to Allahabad, you are hurting the sentiments of hindus. Aayush12233 (talk) 16:30, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

By the way, common names and official names come on the way only in that context where they are recognised simultaneously, one as official and other as common. But, in this context, Prayagraj name has replaced the older official name Allahabad. So, your common names theory doesn't apply here. Aayush12233 (talk) 16:41, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia is for correct up to date information, not for incorrect older information. Writing older info can mislead the readers and can confuse them too! Aayush12233 (talk) 16:44, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kumbh Mela. Please keep to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, if you disagree with them, you can try to get them changed, but don't repeatedly edit in contravention of them - Arjayay (talk) 17:09, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

So, why don't you answer my question as to how Allahabad is more common than Prayagraj? If you have the power to block someone, don't misuse your power, since misuse of power always leads to downfall of a person one day. I have full right to protect my hinduism, even if I get blocked. First discuss with me about this, don't just straightaway overuse your power by saying that I will be blocked repeatedly. Aayush12233 (talk) 00:44, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

So, it seems that you are not interested in talk. So, I am changing the name now. Aayush12233 (talk) 07:40, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. PhilKnight (talk) 13:25, 4 December 2022 (UTC)


 * There is nothing to discuss. I have explained the guidelines above, and what you would need to do to change them, rather than just repeatedly editing in contravention of them, as you are currently doing. You should also look at Talk:Allahabad where it clearly explains that consensus is that "no further move requests should be made before 4 April 2023" - so you will have to wait until then, to even start a discussion. Please note that the English Wikipedia is very slow at changing article titles, as we are only interested in what English-readers world-wide consider to be the WP:COMMONNAME. As an example, we still use Bangalore, despite the official name changing to Bengaluru in 2006, and that has been through 13 discussions on changing the name, the first of which decided to move it back from Bengaluru to Bangalore, and the subsequent 12 discussion decided to keep it as Bangalore/ - Arjayay (talk) 13:31, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

So, you mean that after 4 april 2023, the Allahabad can be completed changed to Prayagraj. If that is the case, then it is fine, but after that the name of Allahabad will no longer be valid and it will have to be changed in any way. Aayush12233 (talk) 14:51, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
 * No, I very clearly said "no further move requests should be made before 4 April 2023". You can then make a request and it will be discussed, but given other examples, such as Bangalore, you may have to wait much longer before there is any consensus on a renaming. - Arjayay (talk) 17:09, 4 December 2022 (UTC)