User talk:Aban0001

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anisha Bhaduri (September 26)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anisha Bhaduri and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Anisha Bhaduri, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Anisha_Bhaduri Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:HitroMilanese&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Anisha_Bhaduri reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 07:28, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

I am not sure I understand. How does an article on Mathures Paul or Tarapada Basu  meet notability guidelines but this article fails, inspite of the lady having a lot more achievements with credibility established from credible sources. Can you advise how this article can be improved to Mathures Paul standards or Tarapada Basu standards, please? Aban0001 (talk) 14:15, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Paid editing?
Hello Aban0001. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Aban0001. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 16:10, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I am not being paid either directly or indirectly for the article. I do not see which of my edits give such an impression - I wished to volunteer for wikipedia and picked the kind of article that I thought would be an easy one to start off with. I do not think any of the statements made by me indicate a less than neutral point of view, and each item is searchable and documented. Before submitting, I checked for similar articles on wiki and chanced on the names I had referred to earlier, which now seem to be clearly paid works. My ask is simple - if the article does not meet your guidelines (inspite of the subject being a multiple prestigious award winning writer and journalist and also the first indian woman Konrad Adeneur fellow) then that is fine. This was more of an experiment anyway. But it is indeed irksome to see that there are so many clearly paid articles on Wiki, makes ome wonder how the names I had mentioned and others like Kusum Nair, Shiv Aroor, Subal Kumar Dey to name a few made it through. Aban0001 (talk) 14:05, 25 January 2021 (UTC)