User talk:Abbasi1969

Replaceable fair use File:Kambin’s Triangle.png
Thanks for uploading File:Kambin’s Triangle.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:33, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. --Iztwoz (talk) 21:16, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
SmartSE (talk) 21:08, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Smartse,

I have only one account abbasi1969, the article has been coautored and coedited by  other autor of peer reviewed paper that has been recently published, I can not see any evidence to the effecet that I have two account, could you please send me where that evidence is posted so I can look at it?

Nomination of Oblique lumbar lateral interbody fusion for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oblique lumbar lateral interbody fusion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Oblique lumbar lateral interbody fusion until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SmartSE (talk) 21:11, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sock puppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. SmartSE (talk) 23:07, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Smartse;

Could you please contact me directly to why you blocked my account? OLLIF was created by me and my coauthor for the paper that has been published in a peer reviewed paper and there is a reference to the paper in the wikipedia article that makes very clear I am one of the author — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abbasi1969 (talk • contribs)


 * I blocked your account as myself and another administrator felt it was very likely that this edit was made under your instruction, even though we could not determine whether it was by you or not. Per WP:MEAT we treat this the same way as if you had two accounts. More generally though, so far your edits have only been to promote your own research here. Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion and not every subject that has been mentioned in peer-reviewed papers is worthy of including in Wikipedia. I will let a third administrator review your unblock request. SmartSE (talk) 12:23, 13 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The thing is that Wikipedia is not for that purpose. We are an encyclopædia. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 20:48, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Smartse and Jeremy,

I do appreciate your effort to keep wikipedia clean and neutral and I do understand why it has appeared that OLLIF article is self promoting, which was not our intent, we will remove any personal reference. we will reduce the entry to the technique and definition and actual peer reviewed results. I do believe there is tremendous public interest to know the surgical technique and information available exactly in this forum, where references are checked and content is reviewed. In this sense Oblique Lumbar interbody fusion is no different than "Deep brain stimulation", "Craniotomy", discectomy and numerous other wikipedia entries. Thanks
 * We actually don't formally review content, especially not medical content. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 16:33, 14 October 2015 (UTC)