User talk:Abbaslhr

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Doug Weller talk 08:57, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Mian Channu are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 08:58, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Ahmadiyya by country, you may be blocked from editing. ''Editors are not allowed to determine what faith a group of people belong to. I know all about the issues about these people and the fact that some other Muslims think they should be killed, but none of that changes the fact that on Wikipedia if a group says they belong to one religion we don't deny that.'' Doug Weller  talk 08:59, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

first of all I'll follow up Wikipedia rules. secondly if someone thinks he knows everything then in my opinion in general he is nothing more than a stupid person on earth. Now as you mentioned some Muslims want them to be killed the grow up kid. i can prove you wrong on it because I'm not ill minded to label a specific group to be killers not even hindu, Muslims or Christian. Please correct words next time..sorry once again #Peace Abbaslhr (talk) 09:07, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm not labelling a group at all. But see Orya Maqbool Jan which ran into yesterday. And "all about" is a figure of speech, it never occurred to me anyone would take that literally. I mean I have read Persecution of Ahmadis so I'm aware of their problems. Please don't tell me no one has ever murdered them (or in fact people of any religion, there's a lot of religious hatred in the world). Doug Weller  talk 09:37, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive behaviour. It appears you are purposefully harassing another editor. Wikipedia aims to provide a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users, as you did on User talk:Doug Weller, potentially compromises that safe environment. If you continue behaving like this, you may be blocked from editing.  ---Wikaviani  (talk) (contribs)  11:02, 14 April 2020 (UTC)


 * If you look at my user page you'll learn a bit more about me. I'm not trying to make your life miserable, I'm trying to make you a better editor. Policy states that "Many users track other users' edits, although usually for collegial or administrative purposes. This should always be done carefully, and with good cause, to avoid raising the suspicion that an editor's contributions are being followed to cause them distress, or out of revenge for a perceived slight. Correct use of an editor's history includes (but is not limited to) fixing unambiguous errors or violations of Wikipedia policy, or correcting related problems on multiple articles."  Doug Weller  talk 11:20, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Wikaviani you are harassing me and i have no intention to harass anyone and never did before. Doug Weller reverts my edits on other article except this one. i simply asked him that i didn't like it and its not the way if we have different views. BUT you guys have rules to threat me again and again?

I edit one word in a article and in return someone wrote " I know all about the issues about these people and the fact that some other Muslims think they should be killed, but none of that changes the fact that on Wikipedia if a group says they belong to one religion we don't deny that."

how can you consider my religion?

Where is this written that Wikipedia decide how many religion are on earth and who belongs to him? Can you provide me reference here that Wikipedia accept claims of a group and support it?

Please i have no issues that you reverts my edits. i TRUST he did it based on rules and i supprt his action on this article.

but i cannot accepts your disrespectful behavior and please be respectful in next reply. Doug Weller have already replied me about his intention regarding second article he edited (Mian Channu) that is a reasonable excuse to accept. All Good. Abbaslhr (talk) 12:01, 14 April 2020 (UTC)


 * You are not being harassed. You were told that your comments do not help build a good working environment and that such behavior gets people blocked. You've now failed to assume that the warning was in good faith, not helpful. I have no idea what "how can you consider my religion?" means. Wikipedia does not attempt to decide how many religions belong, but we do not tell a group that says they belong to a certain religion that they do not. There is a group called the Latter Day Saint Movement which considers themselves Christians and we will stop anyone who tries to make them look as though they are not, which is probably most Christians as their beliefs are as different as the ones that have led the Ahmadis to be persecuted.  Doug Weller  talk 13:58, 14 April 2020 (UTC)