User talk:Abbie Guilding

Thomas Puskailer
Hi Abbie,I deleted your article because This guy may be notable, so I'll shortly put the text here for you to work on  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  11:51, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
 * it did not provide adequate independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. It is now Wikipedia policy that biographical articles about living people must have independent verifiable references, or they will be deleted. Although you gave references, they were all to one website, and included clearly non-neutral material like interviews. If he is genuinely notable, there should be wider coverage in proper independent sources like newspapers and music magazines.
 * It was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: became prominent... also became successes... established a huge fanbase... Thomas wanted to create a more mature sound, for a wider audience... a famous European progressive house producer... a unique and universal appeal... the biggest and most prestigious... a unique and new style of music, a style that reaches to a huge range of music listeners... &mdash; we need facts, not spam
 * Bill Grainer who worked with stars such as... Joe Dworniak who collaborated with world artists such as... &mdash; What has this got to do with Puskailer? It might make Grainer or Dworniak more notable, but that doesn't transfer to him
 * You have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that he is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.
 * If you decide to recreate, note that there should not be any url external links in the text, only in the Reference or External links sections.

I made some minor changes. You don't need anyone's permission to move the page back to article space, just use the "move" tab when you are ready. The text is much better, but a couple of things still.  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  07:15, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I would mention the chart position as soon as possible in the article since it's the only concrete evidence of his notability, his appearances on Slovak and other TV etc won't mean much to English Wikipedia readers.
 * Some of the references are a bit weak, such as the wordpress one.
 * opportunity to collaborate with producers, labels, musicians and artists on an international level. &mdash; could do with a reference
 * Music was always a huge part of his life. &mdash; unsourced, spammy and unencyopaedic, I'd lose it.
 * See if you can reference those parts of the text that are still without a source
 * Make sure that the text is as neutral as you can make it and try to read it from the point of view of someone who has never heard of Thomas and is looking for facts, not opinions or speculation.


 * Hi Abbie, if you are using the default Vector skin, the "Move" tab should be to the right of "View history". If you can't see it, either you were not logged in at the time, or, more likely you haven't made enough edits to become an WP:autoconfirmed user. I'm reluctant to move it myself since a move by an admin doesn't flag up the page as an unpatrolled new page, which means that other editors are less likely to check for notability or other issues. Try posting it here as an uncontroversial move. If nothing happens within a couple of days, get back to me  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  07:13, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Move
You should have selected (article) from the drop-down menu, I've fixed it and deleted the other page. I think you should be safe from a speedy deletion now. It's always possible it might be listed for a deletion discussion, but worry about that if it happens  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  15:00, 30 December 2012 (UTC)