User talk:Abc10

Jutta von Sponheim
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Jutta von Sponheim, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://dbpedia.org/page/Jutta. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:12, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jutta von Sponheim
A tag has been placed on Jutta von Sponheim requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 06:19, 12 February 2010 (UTC)


 * I just removed the text from Jutta to be an independent article. If you want to delete it, it is alright for me. My English is not good enough to rewrite it. May be Wikipedia article is the original and is copied to the other site. --Abc10 (talk) 06:22, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hannu Rajaniemi
A tag has been placed on Hannu Rajaniemi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Rwiggum (Talk /Contrib ) 23:09, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of St. Olaf's Church in Tyrvää (book)
I have nominated St. Olaf's Church in Tyrvää (book), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/St. Olaf's Church in Tyrvää (book). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Snotty Wong  converse 18:49, 4 August 2010 (UTC)


 * The discussion on whether to keep or delete this article can be found here: Articles for deletion/St. Olaf's Church in Tyrvää (book). If you are new to the process, it might be useful for you to review Guide to deletion before commenting.    Snotty Wong   communicate 05:25, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Hannu Rajaniemi
I've deleted this page. Let me know if you'd like me to restore it to your userspace, but I don't think an article about this person is viable yet. Thanks for contributing. &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 14:13, 10 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Yes, please restore. --Abc10 (talk) 16:21, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * It's at User:Abc10/Hannu Rajaniemi. You are free to move this back to article space, but unless you address the concerns it is likely to deleted again. Regards &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 21:54, 10 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you. I'll be waiting for the book to be published until I move it back. --Abc10 (talk) 05:04, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi, the book was published a couple of months ago. Would you please move the article back to article space?--Victor Chmara (talk) 18:28, 28 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Yes, I shall do that. I have noticed it was published but forgot it! Thank you. --Abc10 (talk) 20:55, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Raw View.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Raw View.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ron h jones (Talk) 21:55, 18 November 2014 (UTC)


 * OK now? --Abc10 (talk) 08:42, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

About user talk page.
Yeah, this is Wikipedia isn't this? It's encyclopedia. And, you can send message to the other users via user talk page.

But I, like GorgeCustersSabre, will delete Wikipedia message from my talk page whatever I want. Look at the title, is it the real encyclopedia/article or user talk page like Facebook or Twitter? You like URunICon who won't remove his comments in my talk page and suddenly, he/she accuse me as vandal. If you or URunICon changed the comments in my talk page or the others, whatever your comments or the other comments, I can accuse you as vandal like hacker.

IreneTandry (talk) 05:30, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Artikkelin parannus selkeämmäksi taulukoksi kumottu
Tällaista vandalismia. --85.76.98.198 (talk) 22:05, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Nimenmuutos
Hei, olethan tietoinen, että Bonnier Kirjat Suomi muutti nimensä lähes puolitoista vuotta sitten? Tämä olisi tuotava esiin artikkeleissa Werner Söderström Osakeyhtiö, Tammi, Johnny Kniga, Kosmos ja Bonnier.

Lisäksi on huomattava, ettei Tammi ole enää virallisesti Kustannusosakeyhtiö Tammi, kuten ei Kosmoskaan enää yhtiö.

--85.76.142.165 (talk) 16:26, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Users with indefinitely protected user talk pages". Thank you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 19:19, 27 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The discussion seems to be closed. You may unprotect my talk page. The problem is now over. --Abc10 (talk) 11:28, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)