User talk:Abc384217

Welcome!
Hello, Abc384217, and welcome to Wikipedia!&#32;Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Justyna Mielnikiewicz, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article.&#32;Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * Best practices for editors with close associations
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * The Teahouse, our help forum for new editors

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, visit the Teahouse, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! AntiDionysius (talk) 13:34, 24 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi ,thanks for the answer, I really have no time to dive into all those technical details and try to follow certain logic of being able to protect my name and safety , it is my personal page and I do not wish certain informations to be there for personal and security reasons , can I discuss it please with a legal department  directly so we can discuss the merit and not technical details , would you direct me there please ? , if possible can a page about me be removed entirely ? , thanks , Justyna Abc384217 (talk) 13:57, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Editing your own page is against the conflict of interest policy. If you want help, you can request it through WP:Oversight, but in general, Wikipedia is not censored -- MacAddct1984 (talk &#124; contribs) 14:11, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Further, from our perspective, we have a random user requesting information to be deleted. If the information is based on reliable sources—which it appears the information in the article is—and it doesn't violate the policy for biographies of living people—and I see no obvious violations—there's no valid reason to remove the information. Accordingly, the appropriate action to protect the subject is to disregard any request made by this account as an attempt to disrupt the article!
 * One possible route forward would be to discuss the article with the Volunteer Response Team via email. This opens some possibilities for the Team to authenticate your identity. Again, this does not give you carte blanche to have the article scrubbed, but it opens a channel for communicating about the article and authenticating your identity in the process of doing so.
 * One other note: if the article had a full date of birth, I would have removed that as a privacy concern and left only the year of birth. Since the article already has only a sourced year of birth, nothing needs done there. —C.Fred (talk) 14:24, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you Fred ,I understand your point and concerns, but again I feel that i should have control on how my bio is presented , and both birth date and personal life I consider my personal matter, I will try to discuss is it with VRTeam  - as I understand if I have that info removed from sources from were you pull the info that might be the way to sort it , my birth day from MAPS and personal info from NG ,  am I correct ? ,
 * I am big fun of wikipedia from early days -love to compare how different one article especially on history can be in different languages, yet with all the policies and craziness of modern world where AI grabs all it sees like a  shark - my views are changing a  bit on internet and what is there etc , and that includes wikipedia . Thank you for your assistance , I will try to contact VRTeam . Abc384217 (talk) 14:39, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
 * First, subjects do not own their articles, so they generally do not have control on how bio info is presented. There are some limited exceptions, and full date of birth is one of those. The problem with removing info from National Geographic is they would have to retract the article and state there was an issue with what was published, not just remove it from the online version of the old articles. —C.Fred (talk) 15:14, 24 January 2024 (UTC)