User talk:Abcscholar

March 2017
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Chitpavani Konkani, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   19:30, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 04:54, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Chitpavan. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Stop removing the sourced content, and this is in no way a minor edit. Per WP:BRD you need to discuss this edit on the article's talk page. Meters (talk) 04:59, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Meters (talk) 05:00, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chitpavan. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Chitpavan was changed by Abcscholar (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.851978 on 2017-03-23T07:14:58+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:15, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Materialscientist (talk) 08:54, 23 March 2017 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 09:38, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Nathuram Godse
Sir please dont include Godse in Notable people category, as it is equivalent to saying Hitler is a notable personality when mentioning Germans.People link it with entire community Abcscholar (talk) 22:37, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * We do not exercise censorship on Wikipedia. I am sure Hitler is on notable German persons list. If he isn't, I will add his name there. Thanks.Jonathansammy (talk) 18:57, 29 March 2017 (UTC)