User talk:Abdassamad

Othman Abu-Sahnun the Italian
You have recently created the article Othman Abu-Sahnun the Italian. This was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate the article: if you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a review at Deletion review. Kimchi.sg 17:47, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Salam Alaykum
 Welcome, !

Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm Sa.vakilian, one of the adopter of Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links you might find helpful:


 * [[Image:Nuvola apps kalzium.png|23px]]  The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * [[Image:Nuvola apps kate.png|23px]]  How to edit a page
 * [[Image:Crystal khelpcenter.png|23px]]  Help pages
 * [[Image:Nuvola apps bad kcontrol.png|23px]]  Tutorial
 * [[Image:Crystal Clear app ksokoban.png|23px|]]  How to write a great article
 * [[Image:Crystal_Clear_app_kedit.png|23px]]  Manual of Style
 * [[Image:Nuvola apps kasteroids.png|23px]]  Policies and guidelines

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or type  here on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. If you are already loving Wikipedia, I can help you. ← Sa.vakilian(t-c) --20:46, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Original research
Your edits to The Syro-Aramaic Reading Of The Qur'an are considered original research, which is not allowed on Wikipedia. They had been removed before, and I have done so again. --Benne ['bɛnə] (talk) 15:54, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * You might want to check out Synthesis of published material serving to advance a position.
 * You conjoined material from a Qur'an translation, and from a dictionary, and added your own conclusions to make your position clear. The conclusions, however, are not sourced. This is also considered original research.
 * Considering the author's thesis flawed, on the basis of an in your opinion incorrect translation of this particular surah, is a point of view, not a sourced fact. Also, saying that "the derivation of hur is quite clear and conforms absolutely to the root of the word and the morphology (sarf) of Arabic", constitutes a personal opinion.
 * If you read the book itself, you would see that "the author's thesis" is not "a promise to marry them to white grapes", but Wir werden es ihnen unter weißen, kristall(klaren) (Weintrauben) behaglich machen. "(We will make them comfortable under white, crystal (clear) (wine grapes)." (p. 259) Luxenberg considers letters in the word زوج wrongly rendered, and proposes the verb ﺭوﺡ rawaḥa "to give a rest", related with Syriac ܪܘܚ rwaḥ. --Benne ['bɛnə] (talk) 11:32, 26 April 2007 (UTC)