User talk:Abderitestatos

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Agathoclea 15:35, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Also thanks for sorting out the link to the Swiss Seebach, I could not place any detail from the article here and on dewiki as it was in a historicl context. Agathoclea 15:35, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

I have repaired your cut and paste move
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Some Kind of Wonderful (disambiguation)  a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Some Kind of Wonderful. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:31, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for fixing it. --Abderitestatos (talk) 14:01, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Turicum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Condé ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Turicum check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Turicum?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Edit Warring
Hi there. I'm avoiding a Twinkle automated warning but continuing to revert multiple editors across two different pages, as you have done with Latin numerals and Latin Numerals is editwarring and a violation of WP:3RR. I would suggest you think about just BOLDLY inserting it at Roman numerals and if that doesn't take having a discussion there about the right place for this content. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 00:46, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I already opened a section under Talk:Roman numerals, explaining why the content of my new article should not be included in the article about Roman numerals, but so far nobody answered. --Abderitestatos (talk) 00:56, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
 * You are also welcome to create a draft at Draft:Latin numerals, which would give you time to create the article before presenting it for review. Brad  v  02:15, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Regarding this: Your reinstated article popped up for review at the new page feed. As a New page patrol (NPP) editor, I reviewed it. I have a suggestion which might further distinguish it from the Roman numerals article. Why not call the contested article, "Latin numerals (linguistics)". You could then broaden the scope to include simple Latin math expressions like "equals", "plus", "minus" etc. This would make it a great supplement to our articles on Latin language, while at the same time robustly justifying a fork from the Roman Numeral article. I'd be happy to make the required move and help out where possible with the formatting (I do not speak any Latin at all though). We can have this discussion at the article's talk page. Edaham (talk) 03:11, 1 September 2018 (UTC)