User talk:Abdullah London

List of Turkish Business People in Bulgaria
Two items doesn't make a list. Please continue.Xx236 (talk) 13:23, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Turkish Business People in Bulgaria


The article List of Turkish Business People in Bulgaria has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Uneeded list-we don't need a list for a type of people in a certain job for everything. Plus only 2 people on here.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 01:14, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Copy and pasting
We run "copy and paste" detection software on new edits. One of your edits appear to be infringing on someone else's copyright. See also Copy-paste. We at Wikipedia usually require paraphrasing. If you own the copyright to this material please follow the directions at Donating copyrighted materials to grant license. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:43, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

http://www.dliproductions.ca/author/eylem/

Speedy deletion nomination of Eylem Kaftan


A tag has been placed on Eylem Kaftan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.dliproductions.ca/author/eylem/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa (talk) 20:57, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Cigar Smoking Celebrities for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cigar Smoking Celebrities is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cigar Smoking Celebrities until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:52, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Deniz Toprak Kiziloz


The article Deniz Toprak Kiziloz has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable person. Single claim to notability is the intention to buy a couple of football clubs, but no actual purchase appears to have happened.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:58, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of List of the Worlds Casino Entrepreneurs for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of the Worlds Casino Entrepreneurs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of the Worlds Casino Entrepreneurs until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:25, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Deniz Toprak Kiziloz for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deniz Toprak Kiziloz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Deniz Toprak Kiziloz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:11, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Deniz Toprak Kiziloz. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:16, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Deniz Toprak Kiziloz. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:24, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Re: Hi
Re your message: I have listed the reasons why I believe the articles you created should be deleted on the respective Articles for Deletion pages as linked in the above notices. The general theme is that none of the articles you have created are notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:27, 31 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Re your message: None of the sources you provide actually confirm that he purchased the club. Everything says that he is either in negotiation, he himself claimed the sale was done, or doesn't mention him at all.  If you disagree with the deletion, please either correct the article with citations from reliable sources that he has purchased the club or contest the deletion on the AfD discussion page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:44, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 15:36, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Famous Turks in Switzerland


The article List of Famous Turks in Switzerland has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Redundant, given that we already have List of Swiss Turks, and WP:NPOV makes the title unsuitable, even for a redirect.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Favonian (talk) 15:44, 1 June 2016 (UTC)