User talk:Abdulrafey97

Speedy deletion nomination of File:PIA A310-300.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:PIA A310-300.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 20:48, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014
Please do not continue to upload files with missing or false information on their copyright status, as you did at File:Shaista Lodhi's Picture.jpg. Please note that Wikipedia takes copyright and copyright infringement very seriously. Images and other media may only be uploaded and included if they meet the conditions stated in our image use policy, and if their provenance is clearly documented. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 20:53, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not crystal ball
If you continue to add/edit information without providing citation, such as PIA plans to use seat plans from air asia x (PIA does NOT follow seat plans, rather makes its own), you will be reported and subsequently banned.

Additionally, if you are not familiar with how wikipedia works, follow other articles as an example. PIA leases planes from many companies. It does NOT mean we have to mention who it leases it from. No one cares who PIA is leasing airplane from, or any airline. Hence you do not see this information be it on emirates, PIA, Air India and so forth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.157.147.100 (talk) 21:12, 27 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia isn't a crystal ball in providing info, but it can be made by our efforts. This reflects your mindset that do you want to make it or not. On other hand regarding citations, the website of an airline can be given as reference but in the case of the PIA, does PIA updates its website regarding its fleet? Does it provides you seating configurations? No. I took all of this info from Planespotters.net . Now you cant say that this website also isn't crystal clear in giving info. Be open and Clear minded! Well I felt good that you commented on my edits. Appreciated!

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

PIA
Hello there. Please note that I've reverted the article back to a version that was later modified by you. This was done following the mass removal of content and references made by user Nofil Jawed. I warned them at their talk page. Regards.--Jetstreamer $Talk$ 23:19, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

About Your Revert of My Edit to the Page Pakistan International Airlines
I have reversed your revert. There is a more appropriate category, which I have replaced to from the previous. Don't revert my edit again. Thank you. --113.203.174.48 (talk) 15:38, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Please clarify your editing. Abdulrafey97 (talk) 16:04, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Airblue, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Muscat. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Pakistan International Airlines copyright problem
I have paraphrased and removed content you added to the above article, as it appears to have been copied from http://images.dawn.com/news/1176913/pias-new-in-flight-entertainment-system-lets-you-watch-movies-on-your-phone, a copyright web page. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please let me know if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:37, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Question
G'day from Oz, where it appears we have the better cricket team (although I can take no credit for that). I have a question: which date format is used in Pakistan, is it day-month-year or month-day-year? Cheers YSSYguy (talk) 01:45, 23 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Sure we have a good team and an interesting match too :D! Well, in Pakistan the format is Day-Month-Year. Have a good day! Abdulrafey97 (talk) 08:36, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

. Abdulrafey97 (talk) 19:48, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to airblue, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 13:50, 25 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Fine. But what about the destinations? A proper reference link was provided which was from the airline's official website. Airblue currently has 12 destinations, not 14. And even for the 14 destinations, no reference was provided before my editing. Abdulrafey97 (talk) 14:51, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
 * That is not a valid explanation for removing the terminated destinations from the list.--Jetstreamer $Talk$ 22:18, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Flynas, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 22:17, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Saudia. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Emben12 (talk) 16:31, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi! Isn't it better for you to read the reference already provided before the fleet table on Saudia's page? If you want to add any information, please provide a source or reference. You said it! Abdulrafey97 (talk) 16:49, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Shaheen Air fleet
"A proper reference is already provided and still editing the fleet number of A320s to 7 instead of 8 is against the policy of Wikipedia, which is to provide crystal clear details to Wikipedia readers with a reference even if the information is old. It's better not to add/remove any information without reference."

Against the policy?

I am the one providing them with 'crystal clear' details. The fleet table heading says 'In Service', which refers to aircraft that are currently operating for the airline, and being used to generate revenue. In which case, the correct number of IN SERVICE A320s would be 7, not 8. There are 8 in the fleet of Shaheen Air, but AP-BLH has been stored at Karachi since 6th May due to it being over 20 years old now. I provided 2 valid references, both of which you were very eager to remove. I did not remove any information, I UPDATED it with 2 valid and up-to-date references as well, I don't see how that's against Wiki's policy. I suggest you relax with reverting edits, the talk page is here for a reason. Anyway, you've mentioned '1 stored' in the notes, which is somewhat acceptable, although a total of 18 aircraft being in service isn't accurate or correct, but you seem to be the type of Wiki editor who must always get his way regardless of whether it's even correct or not. --Murtaza2000 (talk) 17:52, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi there! All of the above written can be your thoughts and I respect it. It could possibly be true. Never the less, how could be flightradar24 be a reference for saying that an A320 is stored? Was there any press release by the airline itself? If yes, then provide that. Even then, without any proper reference of storage that clearly mentions that the specific A320 is stored - as you say - and if you wish to provide crystal clear information, then won't it be more appropriate way of giving information about total number of fleet with heading 'Total' instead of 'In Service' and writing ** stored in notes? Its an advice and if you like then go ahead with this. I removed the reference of flightradar24 because many of the aircraft don't have ADS-B receivers or there isn't any coverage of FR24 and as a result there isn't any history of flights available for the aircraft. So in this case, can I assume that that specific aircraft, with no ADS-B transponder or where that aircraft is flying there isn't F24's coverage, is stored? Abdulrafey97 (talk) 18:27, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Do not make unnecessary changes to Pakistan International Airlines
Please stop adding unsourced content. Please stop your disruptive editing. It has been noted that you are editing/reverting different articles as of your personal choice which is against Wikipedia policy. You are once again advised to please stop this and allow everyone to contribute freely. Accept changes made by others, if they are providing proper references. White.pearl7 (talk) 03:42, 13 August 2018 (UTC)