User talk:Abdurrahmanofficial01

Visa
Dear person, The website clearly says that you have to attend the embassy. This goes hand in hand with the information found on ITA. If both the website that issues the Visa in Spanish clearly says this, then it is irresponsible to say that they will be provided an EVISA. An eVisa, and a visa obtained semi online with requirements to attend an embassy, does not qualify as an evisa. Abkhazia is NOT in the list of disputed territories, there IS NO list of disputed territories on this visa page, the list below is for separate areas not disputed areas. It is for overseas regions or autonomous zones. Abkhazia is NOT such. It is self-governing. If you want to apply politics to this, Arminia, Greese, Israel, and Palestine to name a few countries, would be in the autonomous zones section. It is not a reality. These countries have passports, governments, visa restrictions. They are not governed by other countries. If they are occupied or not, depends on the perspective of the person who is reading. Israelis will consider Palestinians to be occupying their land. In reality, it is Palestine that is occupied. All these politics asside Abkhazia is placed in countries because it is such. It is not an autonomous zone of another nation. It is a nation itself. 202.163.68.61 (talk) 17:21, 8 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Sir please stop updating the article with false infomration, Wikipedia must be updated with sources. Not only does the protal itself give clear instructions, the MOFA, All foreign embassies and Timatic all lign up that VISA is not available online, nor on arrival. A visa on arrival means a Pakistani can get on a plane and go, without doing anything. For this to be a conditional visa on arrival, the Bolivian authorites need to update their website and confirm, because as of now no source says so except for you. Its irresponsible to post that people can go somewhere, when they can not. If you have connections to the Bolivian authorities, please tell them to update all their databases to explicitly indicate Pakistanis can get on the plane and go. Pakistanis wont be able to exit pakistan, unless there is a source, as the CAA will stop them. 202.163.68.61 (talk) 00:00, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Brother I hope you can see my messages. The nations you removed are not part of any other nation. They have their own passports, and government system. If you are born there, you are given nationality to those nations. Occupation in the past does not indicate they are occupied now. Other Wikipedia articles might contain such information because it includes nations that were occupied in the past. It would be insulting to call these countries as over seas territories because they are free now and no longer independent. 202.163.68.61 (talk) 23:33, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Brother There are many countries that do not have their own passport like montserrat, it is a part of united kingdom, even the citizenship law is the same. So it is fine to call them a territory. Abdurrahmanofficial01 (talk) 08:26, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Also many of these countries are not recognized by United Nations, and that's why I separated them so there could be a clear identification of territories and countries. You can search on web that there are only 199 countries and all other are territories. Also I am not disrespecting the country I am just telling the truth that they are partially or not recognized. Abdurrahmanofficial01 (talk) 08:33, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The United nations requires a MEMBERSHIP. If countries do not pay, they do not get recognition. Furthermore, nations who are involved with UN, have to abide by UN rules. It is not a fact that only nations in UN membership are nations. What makes a nation a nation, they have their own government, self governing, own boarder controls, own passport, own immigration laws or local laws, laws of another nation does not apply to them and another nation has no control over what goes on in that area. I will give you examples, Guam is a part of the united states. Those born in Guam, are American. American samoa on other hand, has their own citizenship laws, those who are born there are not allowed to have American citizenship.    Macau and Hong Kong are similar however, what makes that different is that China makes it very clear that these are Autonomous regions, not Sovern, and they are directly influenced and governed by the Chinese government. Those areas also clearly state that they are related.  In the eyes of Greenland, Greenland is another anomaly. It is an independent nation, within the kingdom of Denmark. Think of it as the Ottoman empire, being the leader of all, and inside of the empire there are nations. A nation, within a nation. It is not a part of the EU, they do have their own passport even though they do have an option to choose a Danish EU passport or a Danish Greenland passport. Most people consider it to be as separate as Canada is to the UK government, seeing as Canada still uses the Queen on their passports and currency, and some laws need to be regulated by the British government.  Some of those overseas dutch nations I may change and move after looking closely. However places like Cayman Islands for example, are clearly independant, have their own passport and absolutely nothing to do with UK. You can buy citizenship to the Cayman Islands, those born there do not become British citizens. It is a really complicated topic but we do not want to offend people because the idea that what defines a country is UN membership, is not good. As most places rather have nothing to do with the UN, they force their laws and ideas on them.  Sometimes the UN wants to sanction countries or force them to share tax information on their citizens. 202.163.68.61 (talk) 15:22, 16 April 2023 (UTC)