User talk:Abe August

February 2016
Hello, I'm Cyphoidbomb. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Pranchiyettan & the Saint seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Diff:  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:19, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Premam with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ches (talk) 17:33, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Pranchiyettan & the Saint with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. ⁓ Hello  71  17:41, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Big B (film). Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Big B (film) was changed by Abe August (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.97238 on 2016-02-18T18:17:43+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:17, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Correct edit summaries
Hi there, this is not the repair of a typo. It's important that you be sure your edit summaries accurately describe the edit you have made, because edit summaries are how we communicate the rationale for our edits with other editors. In a case like this, changing a film's genre without an accurate explanation tends to look like subtle genre warring, which I'm sure was not your intention. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:20, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

February 2016
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article. ''Diffs: The Wikipedia community is not interested in your opinions and your analysis of films and financial/box office response. I've already warned you about this. If you do it again, I'll interrupt your editing privileges.'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:18, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:06, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

For:. Please stop editorializing in articles. We only care what reliable published sources with established reputations for fact-checking and accuracy have to say, not random internet users such as you and me. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:12, 16 September 2016 (UTC)