User talk:Abeer Alhendi

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/In Situ Electron Microscope concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/In Situ Electron Microscope, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:08, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: In situ electron microscopy has been accepted
 In situ electron microscopy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! ~KvnG 21:57, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Abeer_Alhendi help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Nomination of In situ electron microscopy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article In situ electron microscopy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/In situ electron microscopy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. FuzzyMagma (talk) 18:33, 2 August 2023 (UTC)