User talk:Abekhan2

February 2017
Hello, I'm Twitbookspacetube. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Executive Order 13769, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Please note that the verifiability policy mandates that unsourced material that has been challenged, such as by a "fact" tag, or by its removal, may not be added back without a reliable, published source being cited for the content, using an inline citation. The cited source must clearly support the material as presented in the article, and the burden is on the person wishing to keep in the disputed material. So if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so, following these requirements! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Twitbookspacetube (talk) 08:37, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Executive Order 13769, without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Twitbookspacetube (talk) 08:44, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Executive Order 13769
I suggest you read the references. Jim1138 (talk) 08:45, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Executive Order 13769. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Twitbookspacetube (talk) 08:53, 11 February 2017 (UTC)