User talk:Abelinc0lnl0g

Abelinc0lnl0g, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

Speedy deletion nomination of FortuneBuilders Gives


A tag has been placed on FortuneBuilders Gives requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —Largo Plazo (talk) 23:22, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of FortuneBuilders Gives for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article FortuneBuilders Gives is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/FortuneBuilders Gives until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Largo Plazo (talk) 14:28, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Please don't change the format of dates, as you did to Oscar Wilde. As a general rule, if an article has evolved using predominantly one format, the dates should be left in the format they were originally written in, unless there are reasons for changing it based on strong national ties to the topic. Please also note that Wikipedia does not use ordinal suffixes (e.g., st, nd, th), articles, or leading zeros on dates.

For more information about how dates should be written on Wikipedia, please see this page.

If you have any questions about this, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Enjoy your time on Wikipedia. Please see MOS:DATETIES; switching to American date format is not appropriate. Favonian (talk) 21:06, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

British English vs American English
Hello! I see that you have been making some edits to "correct" spellings or dates. Please be aware that articles about British/Welsh/English/Scottish people should be written in British English, as per MOS:ENGVAR. For example, honour is the correct spelling, not honor. Equally, dates should be in the form DMY not MDY. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 20:36, 9 January 2017 (UTC)