User talk:Abeszhak/sandbox

This is where the peer review feedback for Abeszhak's sandbox draft content should be posted. Be sure to sign your post and complete the Canvas quiz to receive credit for your work. UWM.AP.Endo (talk) 03:29, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Cristian Cuevas review of this sandbox
Is the content written in a neutral, unbiased tone? Yes it is a neutral tone.

Do the citations follow the MEDRS (Links to an external site.) (medicine, reliable sources) guidelines? I did not find a citation in the sandbox to see if its following the MEDRS.

Are the citations formatted correctly? There was no citation found in the sandbox.

Visit the main article that your classmate is contributing their new content to.

Does it make sense to add this new content to the proposed article? The new content that they have added was not changed from the original main article. It was just copied and pasted onto their sandbox.

Are there any other areas of the main article that your classmate could contribute to? I believe they can add to the isoforms section of the main article. Also can add more information in the structural studies section. The other sections of the article have quite a bit of information already.

Cristiancuev (talk) 02:16, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Clarification on Cristian's Peer review
Hi, I might've misunderstood some of the directions for our recent assignments but I added the information that I had learned as I was developing my specific aims directly to the actual article for 11B-HSD, and then also included it in my sandbox. Cristian says that I copied and pasted into my sandbox, which is true, but the content that I copied and pasted was my own. Here's a link to the revision history page of the 11B-HSD article w/ the timestamps of my earlier additions. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=11β-Hydroxysteroid_dehydrogenase&action=history Here is a link for the revision history page of my Sandbox, showing that I copied and pasted what I had published on the actual 11B-HSD article into my Sandbox 6 days after I made the initial publication. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Abeszhak/sandbox&action=history

Again, I might've misunderstood some assignments along the way, but I just wanted to clarify that I didn't copy and paste someone else's work from the wikipedia article that I'm assigned to. Abeszhak (talk) 06:31, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

I should also add that Cristian did his review before I went in and corrected my citations not being present. That's certainly not his fault, I just didn't hit "publish" in the first place. Abeszhak (talk) 07:52, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Jonathan Doria Peer Review.
Is the content written in a neutral, unbiased tone? Yes it is.

Do the citations follow the MEDRS (Links to an external site.) (medicine, reliable sources) guidelines? Yes, both references link to secondary articles.

Are the citations formatted correctly? Yes they are. In text citations and the generated references at the bottom of the page are present.

Visit the main article that your classmate is contributing their new content to.

Does it make sense to add this new content to the proposed article? I think so. This information seems to be a good addition to the information already present.

Are there any other areas of the main article that your classmate could contribute to? Again, probably but I don't see the need. We are only making small edits. Focusing on one part to edit will make for better edits.

AnonymousUsernam33 (talk) 13:14, 23 November 2020 (UTC)