User talk:AbhiMukh97/Archive 1

Classification of AC transmission line moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Classification of AC transmission line, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 06:14, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Copying licensed material requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Draft:Classification of AC transmission line. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:27, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Performance of AC Transmission Lines (July 20)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Performance of AC Transmission Lines and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Performance of AC Transmission Lines, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Performance_of_AC_Transmission_Lines Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AngusWOOF&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Performance_of_AC_Transmission_Lines reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 16:18, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
Your addition to Draft:Performance of AC Transmission Lines has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:19, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Help Needed on Chandrayaan-2 page
A user called Rowan Forest is reverting changes everytime when someone mentions that Chandrayaan-2 is first mission going to South Pole. That user just can't tolerate that Indian mission can be First. In Introduction section he again edited and changed to "southernmost mission" and removed Indian mission being First. His argument is Chinese landed on South pole first but in reality Chinese Chang'e 4 landed at 45.5 latitude which is much farther from South Pole while India is aiming to land at 70 degree latitude.. Please help against that user Artemis51 (talk) 08:26, 23 July 2019 (UTC)


 * To be honest, Chang'e 4 was the first to land on the far side of moon, Chandrayaan-2 will be the first southernmost landing, and the second landing on far (dark) side of moon. And there's nothing wrong in that data, as of now. On 3 January 2019, the Chang'e 4, a Chinese spacecraft, was the first to soft land near the lunar south polar region,[13] (45.5 ° S, 177.6 ° E) in the Von Kármán crater, which comes within the lunar far region(unfortunately).AbhiMukh97 (talk) 11:28, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Madara Uchiha


A tag has been placed on Draft:Madara Uchiha requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://myanime2go.com/2017/11/showdown-of-the-baddees-madara-uchiha-vs-aizen-sosuke.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick (Talk)  13:36, 2 August 2019 (UTC)


 * I have deleted this as an unambiguous copyright violation. Do not post copyright material to wikipedia.  GoldenRing (talk) 13:56, 2 August 2019 (UTC)


 * : Sorry to hear that. But the source, from which I copied the information belongs to wikipedia.

The source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Naruto_characters#Madara_Uchiha

If you can, please check for reverse copy vio. AbhiMukh97 Speak 14:39, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
 * , Please reread the message Diannaa sent you on 19 July. Even thought it came form Wikipedia, it is still a policy violation if you do not properly attribute the material. Diannaa explained how to do this. S Philbrick  (Talk)  16:04, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Madara Uchiha's draft
In regards to Madara Uchiha, I recommend you reading this guide about writing fictional characters' article. While the Naruto wiki has freedom to create any article, Wikipedia requires us to make the article pass WP:Notability in order to prove the character is important within the real world. See Nagato (Naruto) as an example of how character articles should be done. Hope you have fun with Wikipedia.Tintor2 (talk) 15:58, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
 * It'll certainly take some research, but I think Madara has far more influence in the series than Nagato. And regarding the reception, it'll be fun to explore. Thank you AbhiMukh97 Speak 07:25, 5 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Influence in the series is not relevant for fictional characters. If not we would have created articles for Minato and the Sage of the Six Paths too. Reception also requires citations from WP:Reliable sources, so be careful with finding different sources. Another important thing about fictional characters is having information about their creation which is often challenging (for example, I have been unable to find anything about the adult designs of Naruto and Sasuke even though the former is a FA). Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 16:29, 5 August 2019 (UTC)


 * I would advise you again to focus on reliable third party sources. Polls from sites whose writers' real names are not reliable. Check the guidelines and search for sources that comment on the character critically rather than simply labeling as best fighter or villain. And remember to focus on Madara rather than Obito.Tintor2 (talk) 19:04, 6 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your suggestions, I highly appreciate that. But as you can see, I'm just trying to sum up all the information I can find over internet, it looks kind of messed up. Ill try to fix that and exclude non-reliable sources as early as possible. And as you've said, I haven't found any information on creation and design of Madara, despite searching for it. As obito disguised himself as Madara and carried out his will, it'll be hard to discuss Madara without Obito. Again, thanks for your suggestions. AbhiMukh97 Speak 02:01, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

BTW, I remember you thinking about a good image of the character. Chapter 398 has a color page showing Madara so it might help if you can create the article.Tintor2 (talk) 22:38, 9 August 2019 (UTC)


 * I've been searching for it, for a while and managed to find two pictures that can be used. You can check it out, if you want.

The only thing that I need is some valid information behind the creation and conception of Madara. I haven't found any interview where Kishi talks about creation of Madara. Thanks for your help though. AbhiMukh97 Speak 04:07, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
 * |Naruto Artbook 2 Page 61(That you've already suggested)
 * Naruto Volume 62 Cover art( https://i.pinimg.com/originals/d0/d0/19/d0d0195cd778a8733dc812d65925e6a3.jpg )

Sorry for pinging you here Flowerpiep but any chance might you know about the character's creation? Still, I kind of doubt it considering he appears kind of late in the story.Tintor2 (talk) 03:25, 11 August 2019 (UTC)


 * I found this and this over the internet, but they don't seem genuine. AbhiMukh97 (Speak) (Contribs) 08:39, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

the first has a source. Try asking the author if possible. The kobayashi interview is useful.Tintor2 (talk) 12:18, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Please review the article. I've almost completed it. It's under AfC submission. AbhiMukh97 (Speak) (Contribs) 08:12, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

I have never done a review though but I think the article passes WP:Notability. However, I would recommend you giving it a relook to rearrange some parts. Remember to keep the narrative as short as possible and focus only on the most important traits of the characters like his backstory or what he intends to do. Same with in universe concepts. For example, explain what is a Jinchuriki or what can he do. See Naruto and Sasuke's article as primary example since that, while being protagonists, their appearances sections only focus on their most important parts of the series. If we had to count every fight Naruto and Sasuke had done, the articles would be ridiculously long. About the reception, try to give that big section as a balance. Can you split it into two paragraphs and give each one its theme to explore. Same as with the other Naruto characters, each paragraph needs an area like a formal letter. If you can do it, I'm pretty sure you can create the article. Good work.Tintor2 (talk) 16:21, 26 August 2019 (UTC)


 * , please trim down the lead paragraphs to just a single paragraph or two as with Moka Akashiya, Sakura Kinomoto, or Jessica Day (New Girl). It doesn't need a detailed history of the character. Also summarize the appearances. It doesn't need to be that long. The goal is to just get it out of draft, not to embellish it to GA, so the key things are to show that the character is independently notable from the rest of the series and the list of Naruto characters.  AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 21:39, 26 August 2019 (UTC)


 * I went bold and trimmed the plot section. I would say that the first paragraph of the appearances section should focus on his background while the second and third should instead show story in the war similar to Nagato's article. The section description is completely unsourced which might come across as original research considering articles always have images that detail their most common features. Keep up the good work. In regards to the reception section, I advise you to divide into at least two and reduce the usage of quotes.Tintor2 (talk) 00:39, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the help, I really appreciate that. It looks much better now. Thanks for the suggestion, I'll try my best to summerise the parts you highlighted. It'll be better if you guys can help me with it, especially the creation and conception section. I didn't find anything related to creation of Madara other than the two sources cited above. Thanks again.  AbhiMukh97 (Speak) (Contribs) 06:19, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I've trimmed it further. Please review. AbhiMukh97 (Speak) (Contribs) 10:35, 27 August 2019 (UTC)


 * I would still trim out all the plot in the opening paragraphs; this can be briefly summarized in the "appearances in" section. See Gaara. It only should discuss briefly who he is and what his ability is. The rest of the opening paragraphs summarize his popularity and appearances in the various media. Also the reception section should be broken up in paragraphs as suggested above. If he's appeared in several top 10 or top whatever polls, then keep that to one sentence. You can add a sentence about merchandise. Already done. Pick reception where it discusses the character, what critics liked and disliked, and how the character develops over the course of the series. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 10:49, 27 August 2019 (UTC) updated 15:30, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep in mind, Wikipedia is not for everything we know about the character. Save that for Wikias / Fandom pages. It should just be a short and concise description of the character and his impact on the anime industry and beyond. There are a bunch of details that are just plot stuff or personal analysis that aren't needed for the article. Those should be removed. Also think of an out-of-universe perspective, like how you would describe this character to someone who knows nothing about the Naruto series. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 15:36, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

I trimmed it a bit more. Take into account that since Wikipedia is an encylopedia, the writing has to be done from a neutral point of view. The reception still needs some clean up. Avoid using too many quotes and instead paraphrase. Use other articles like Mitsuki (Naruto) that don't copy every segment from the reviews and instead reword stuff while also dividing paragraphs on different subjects about the character. For example, Squall Leonhart has a paragraph composed of positive response and another one made from negative response. Most Naruto characters have paragraphs dedicated to different appearances of them.Tintor2 (talk) 20:49, 27 August 2019 (UTC)


 * It could also be split by manga reception and anime reception if the portrayals are different enough to be notable. Anyway, do you think it would survive notability, just the basic WP:THREE or WP:GNG? AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 01:43, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I have removed the description section and merged some of it's contents to the lead section. AbhiMukh97 (Speak) (Contribs) 04:43, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
 * , I trimmed down the summary in the lead paragraph. The appearances section should be trimmed down more too. Have you found the three sources that focus on Madara? AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 14:33, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
 * We have trimmed the appearances section a bit more. What do you mean by three sources, I mean sources for what?? Creation section or reception section. AbhiMukh97 (Speak) (Contribs) 07:03, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
 * See WP:THREE, list them at the top of the article so that AFC reviewers can be convinced the character is independently notable. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 16:56, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

I trimmed the appearances more a bit more and reworded the other media by showing his actual video game appearances as well as his OVA. I'm not sure if the fictional information needs more clean up, but I think it's the reception what's need a further retouch to avoid having so many quotes.Tintor2 (talk) 21:44, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I've diluted some of the quotes, in reception section. AbhiMukh97 (Speak) (Contribs) 09:26, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

,, the article has now been moved into mainspace. I couldn't push out the AFCH banner to publish congrats, but wanted to let you know I manually added it to the AFC listing at WP:AFC. Congrats and keep working on trimming the article as someone's already dated the overly detailed tag on the article. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 17:07, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi AbhiMukh97! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 07:46, Saturday, August 17, 2019 (UTC)

Joseph Boyden
The current biography, especially “controversies” section is criminally irresponsible and mostly based on conjecture and an aggressive political stance against Boyden. There are numerous glaring mistruths and bald faced lies held up by deeply questionable magazines and articles quoted. They need to be edited out. Wasauksing (talk) 05:30, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I can understand your concern. However, you can't just change the article like that. Read WP:COI and you'll know what I'm talking about. Please refrain from direct editing, discuss with the editors of that article about which direction the article will grow and on what basis. Neutrality is one of the vital pillars of Wikipedia, so make sure that your suggestions follow WP:NPOV. I would also suggest you to go through WP:POINT and make sure that it doesn't fall under WP:FRINGE as it may lead to WP:HOAX. Feel free to ask me anything. Thank you, AbhiMukh97 (Speak) (Contribs) 14:24, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Uw-neucoi


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Uw-neucoi, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Railfan23 (talk) 14:46, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I've requested G-7 for that. Forgot to add Template: prefix. Thanks, AbhiMukh97 (Speak) (Contribs) 14:49, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Yws, but I'm afraid that's not the only problem. Even at Template:Uw-neucoi there are serious issues with this template. It is poorly written, for example "on neutral point" is meaningless. Perhaps you meant to write something like "don't follow to a neutral point of view"? Note that I linked to the policy in question. There are several more examples of this in the template. The template is too specific to be useful - it would only be applicable in a handful of cases. It is misnamed - how is this a Conflict of Interest template when it doesn't mention conflicts of interest? Finally, this appears to ultimately be an attempt to duplicate Template:Uw-npov1. We already have a series of templates that covers warning people about violating policy on the neutral point of view. In general, I would steer clear of creating new templates. Best luck, Railfan23 (talk) 15:00, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Certainly, the template is too much specific. But I dont think it is similar to Template:Uw-npov1. If you think it shouldn't exist on wikipedia, I've no issues with that. However, I think Most of The conflict of interest cases are about the lack of neutrality. I'm nominating it for G-7 if it's already not deleted. Thanks AbhiMukh97 (Speak) (Contribs) 15:10, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Uw-neucoi


A tag has been placed on Template:Uw-neucoi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Railfan23 (talk) 15:00, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

I-400 class "reverse engineering"
Apparently, when completely unsourced additions about "reverse engineering" was added, that slipped by with hardly any challenge. When said unsourced additions were removed, it was reverted immediately. I'm sorry, but what? Did you even check the edit history of the article? Not even the sources cited in that section remotely support the "reverse engineering" claim, nor does any book on US submarines (including Norman Friedman). What kind of standard is Wikipedia holding then? 2600:1700:6000:9CA0:34B7:C4D1:7E2E:617D (talk) 10:03, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
 * This article says too much about the submarine. Especially the part I-400-class submarine. But there is no reliable reference or no reference at all. We need to find some valid reference. And change the article accordingly. This will save a lot of effort and time and will be hassle-free. We have no control over what already happened. But we can at least try to change what is happening, to the right direction.

Harold LLoyd - Greenacres
As an associate to the Harold Lloyd family, I request evidence that Harold Lloyd has anything to do with your false allegations that Harold had anything to do with with a community that tried to legally remove minorities from the Benedict Canyon area. In reality, Mr. Lloyd had nothing to do with any of this. LEGAL ACTION FROM THE LLOYD FAMILY TO FOLLOW, as this is slander.

I will continue to remove daily. Expect it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chatterbox1880 (talk • contribs) 23:11, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Please see discussion at User talk:Chatterbox1880. Cbl62 (talk) 23:40, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Damascus Airport
Please don't rely on Twinkle, I clearly stated that my changes are in accordance with our guidelines. WP:AIRPORTS-CONTENT clearly states that listing former airline services in airport articles is NOT allowed. Feel free to discuss this guideline (which had been in place for over 10 years) at WP:AVIATION. Best regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.217.127.94 (talk) 15:00, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I don't know what are you talking about, but WP:AVIATION is a wikiproject and not a guideline. AbhiMukh97 (Speak) (Contribs) 15:04, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

about Abdelrahman Mohamed (handballer)
this handball player is the best goalkeeper in the world and I give a two links to prove that he is the best and also his name on this article at Wikipedia [] Hesham Hussain (talk) 16:19, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I can understand your concern. I know you're willing to help Wikipedia. But, to create a stand-alone article for any person, two links will do nothing. You need more independent reliable sources (Read WP:NOTABILITY). And don't use words like "He is the best" as it conflicts with WP:NPOV.

Speedy deletion declined: Abdelrahman Mohamed (handballer)
Hello AbhiMukh97. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Abdelrahman Mohamed (handballer), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''This article is not WP:A1 candidate. The context is clear enough: Abdelrahman Mohamed is a young Egyptian handball player who has played for his national youth team. The question should be: is this article a WP:A7 candidate?''' Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 09:58, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
 * The article is very short and contains very fewer sources. I've tagged it for A7 but was rejected. I think we should just move it to draft space. The footballer is indeed famous for his goalkeeping skills. He is at no. 10 on the best goalkeepers [list] AbhiMukh97 (Speak) (Contribs) 10:12, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (their is a lot of short articles about handball player at Wikipedia for example Fletcher Abram, Richard Abrahamson , William Ahlemeyer and a lot of handball player you can look at , Category:American male handball players ) --Hesham Hussain (talk) 11:56, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, I saw them too. You can contest the speedy deletion. If you need any help, just let me know. I'll Try to help. Thank you, AbhiMukh97 (Speak) (Contribs) 12:08, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Thank you so much Hesham Hussain (talk) 12:37, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

hardy caprio
I have done this on behalf of hardy caprio so can you please stop editing it back - thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C5:B300:3701:888E:95A2:B28F:257 (talk) 09:21, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Don't do unconstructive editing. I'll stop editing back. Thank you, AbhiMukh97 (Speak) (Contribs) 09:48, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Your use of Twinkle
Please do not blindly rely on the use of Twinkle, which is known to give false alarms. Your editing history shows several cases where you undid edits in bulk which were completely in accordance with our guidelines. This causes trouble to editors which fully comply to our code of conduct. You have to check all Twinkle warnings manually for their justification. Best regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.217.122.138 (talk) 13:18, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Twinkle has nothing to do with giving alarms, let alone giving a false alarm. AbhiMukh97 (Speak) (Contribs) 12:53, 31 August 2019 (UTC)