User talk:Abhijeetbahadure

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abhijeet Bahadure (January 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abhijeet Bahadure and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Abhijeet_Bahadure Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DoubleGrazing&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Abhijeet_Bahadure reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Notable people who have edited Wikipedia). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Abhijeet Bahadure


A tag has been placed on Draft:Abhijeet Bahadure, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: AbhijeetBahadure (January 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jeraxmoira was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AbhijeetBahadure and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:AbhijeetBahadure Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jeraxmoira&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:AbhijeetBahadure reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 21:05, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: ABHIJEET BAHADURE (January 16)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ABHIJEET BAHADURE and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:ABHIJEET_BAHADURE Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DoubleGrazing&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:ABHIJEET_BAHADURE reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:27, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Multiple drafts
Please don't create multiple drafts on the same topic. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:28, 16 January 2024 (UTC)


 * since it was my first time writing experience on wiki ,i wasnt aware about the format and dint know how to add relevant links as proofs ,which i tried to learn from online articles and tried to re do the whole articles using whatever little knwoledge i could gain.It was corrected re submission and not intentional duplication of previous article.Sad to see that how a new person without any prior knowledge and still trying to learn "how to write article " is demotivated by expereinced moderators. Abhijeetbahadure (talk) 10:27, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Kinu t/c 09:15, 16 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Its was not made for adverstising or any kind of promotions ,rather the journey of an artist is shared with relevant publications from various news sources ,which are quite motivational and inspiring for new generation budding artist.After teaching over 500 stuendts globally ,i felt like can be worth sharing for many budding artist.kindly search the artist profile over internet.Sad to see the response and unpleasent experience. Abhijeetbahadure (talk) 10:22, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Abhijeetbahadure (talk) 15:16, 16 January 2024 (UTC)


 * You are misusing the ip unblock request, it's intended for ip editors accidentally caught by a block, whereas you used an ip address to try to evade the block of your sock puppet . Use the unblock request ion my blocking message above Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:25, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Dear jimfbleak,
 * I hope this messagel finds you well. My name is Abhijeet Bahadure, and I am writing to request the lifting of the ban on creating a Wikipedia page. I am a watercolor artist based in India, and I have recently encountered challenges while trying to contribute to the Wikipedia community.
 * I understand the importance of adhering to Wikipedia guidelines and policies, and I acknowledge that my initial attempts may not have met the expected standards. I am, however, eager to rectify any mistakes and contribute positively to the platform.
 * I have invested time and effort in learning how to create a Wikipedia page by following online tutorials and guidelines. Unfortunately, my attempts to share my journey as a watercolor artist were met with a ban. My intention was not to use Wikipedia as a platform for self-promotion but rather to offer an inspirational story for budding artists, sharing my transition from being an engineer in the corporate world to pursuing my passion for watercolor art.
 * I have garnered credibility among students worldwide, evidenced by my 5-star ratings on Google. Additionally, my journey has been featured in multiple news media outlets and newspapers. It was disheartening to encounter obstacles while attempting to share my story in a format that is accessible to a wider audience.
 * I kindly request you to reconsider the ban on my Wikipedia page creation. I am committed to adhering to the guidelines and ensuring that my contributions align with Wikipedia's standards. Moreover, I would appreciate any guidance or feedback on how to create a suitable Wikipedia page that meets the community's expectations.
 * I have encountered and network issue and had to change over to a mobile hotspot.I hade no intention to evade any block.it was just unfortunate technical glitch.i apologize for same.
 * Thank you for your time and consideration. I am eager to contribute positively to the Wikipedia community and share my story in a manner that aligns with your platform's values.
 * Sincerely,
 * [Abhijeet Bahadure] Abhijeetbahadure (talk) 15:31, 16 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Don't waste our time with chatbot generated requests, thank you. --jpgordon&#x1d122;&#x1d106;&#x1D110;&#x1d107; 15:40, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * i kindly request that by mistake it happened.Everyone deserve a second chance Dont be so harsh.i know your are just doing your work.kindly reconsider.its an request. Abhijeetbahadure (talk) 16:07, 16 January 2024 (UTC)


 * There is no chance of you being unblocked if you intend to continue writing about yourself Jimfbleak - talk to me?</i> 16:43, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Dear Jimfbleak,i will surely not intend to write about myself in future by my own .Kindly consider my request and suggest me the solution.i am sure you will be generous enough.Thanks Abhijeetbahadure (talk) 17:19, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Given that you sent me the same comments posted above via e-mail, and as the blocking administrator, I feel compelled to reply. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not, among other things, a place to "share [your] story in a format that is accessible to a wider audience". This site is not intended as a blog, social media, or personal website hosting service, and autobiographies are discouraged for that reason. Note that the term "promotion" does not necessarily indicate that there is some sort of monetary gain involved. As your reply to Jimfbleak indicates that you will not write about yourself, can you confirm that understand these principles? If so, what do you intend to edit? This would be helpful toward evaluating any formal unblock request, which you can make via the unblock template as indicated above. <strong style="color:blue">Kinu <i style="color: red">t</i>/<i style="color:red">c</i> 22:50, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Why do you need to view the script if you have no plans to subsequently edit? There's no need for you to look at it if you have nothing you want to edit about. 331dot (talk) 16:39, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

One is able to view Wikipedia articles (along with the associated wiki markup) without needing the ability to edit. As you state "I have no plans to edit anything at present", continued unblock requests will presumably be declined as frivolous. -- <strong style="color:blue">Kinu <i style="color: red">t</i>/<i style="color:red">c</i> 16:44, 17 January 2024 (UTC)


 * i guess ,why i want to see is in my personal scope and fundamental right.I may be using it for study purpose,understanding knowledge in my personal scope.Markup surely dont allow you to read the script.SO have have technically not allowing me to edit the script but along with that additional rstriction of even viewing the script.Do answer my question instead of asking counter question ,will i be able to see script with blocked status.A blocked user cant edit for sure but should be able to "View" the script irrsepctive of his will to edit or not to edit. or you request necessory changes in the systems that a blocked person can view the scrip but cant edit .I am ok with that.All above counter questions made by your are surely contracdicting with wikipedia policy that any one can edit but not the blocked user.So either you add in the system that "blocked user can view script but cant edit " or either you lift the block.its surely not satisfactory answer given from your end but just misuse of the authority and being harsh with the newbies and unfriendly environment..That too after giving commitment of not going against the policy in future  and where you hve full power of blocking in case policy is not followed. Abhijeetbahadure (talk) 17:06, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
 * You're blocked now. Problem solved. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:04, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note to reviewing admin. I kinda feel like it's time to revoke TPA -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:16, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
 * "Markup surely dont [sic] allow you to read the script"—the markup is the "script" (assuming that by "script" you are referring to the source code of the page). Considering you've been told numerous times that anyone can view that regardless of blocked status, you are either being disingenuous in your comments or there is a comprehension issue. -- <strong style="color:blue">Kinu <i style="color: red">t</i>/<i style="color:red">c</i> 22:14, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

<div class="user-block blocked-talk-revoked" style="background:#ffe0e0; border:1px solid #886644; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em auto; min-height: 40px"> Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. --jpgordon&#x1d122;&#x1d106;&#x1D110;&#x1d107; 18:39, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

No, I don't go to restaurants I don't intend to eat something in. 331dot (talk) 22:37, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

UTRS
has been declined. JBW (talk) 21:37, 17 January 2024 (UTC)