User talk:Abhinavname

Hello
I know who you are as we had discussions from long.Please do not try to create ego against Boxofficeindia.Just think why it has been used widely from long and the consensus was not created by me.I started editting just 7 months back.If you are really fond of editting then try to make friendly nature with users so we all work together by discussing calmly.I had assumed bad faith sometimes and got reward too.Feel free to talk to me. ---zeeyanketu talk to me 17:41, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Sorry,but dont take me wrong.I ma friendly with all.Just i am putting my views only so that Wikipedia can grow in a good manner.I am only concerned about those movie buffs anf people who are loving data and gross collections of bollywood films,when they will will view the articles of these films like JTHJ and SOS.they will be taken by shock,because 16-18 crore difference is there in Box Office India figures of India.Overseas figures are exact beacuse all take data from same source only. I am not having ego against Box Office India justthe figures for diwali releaseas have significant differences. User talk:Abhinavname 17:45, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * You are still doing the same.Why dont you request these valuable comments from administrator's directly. ---zeeyanketu talk to me 14:42, 11 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Sorry,but can you Please tell me who are administrators for Son of Sardaar page,so that i can contact them.User talk:Abhinavname 14:45, 11 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Pardon me while I (an administrator) jump in here. First of all, there are no administrators for pages. Admins are simply normal Wikipedia editors who have a few extra special tools, like blocking users and protecting pages. We don't have any special authority over the content of pages. That must work out collaboratively, through discussion, until a consensus can be reached.
 * Next, Abhinavname, is it correct that this is not your first Wikipedia account? You don't seem to deny it above.
 * Third, perhaps Zeeyanketu's comments mislead you, but you actually should not be going around to random editors and asking for their input on articles. Doing so can be problematic, especially if you're choosing people specifically because you're trying to build support for one specific position. Could you please tell me how you chose those people to ask for their comments? Qwyrxian (talk) 23:19, 11 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Actually,I was unaware earlier that Wikipedia can be edited by us.I thought the wikipedia company is giving information there.then i after some browsing i cam e to know that i can also edit wikipedia and contribute towards it.Sp,obviously this is my first account.I have seen some users comments on Jab Tak Hai Jaan and Son of Sardaar talk pages.they were not satisfied with Box Office India figures,like me.What is the credibility of Box Office India to question the collection reported by the distributor. Are they even aware of the subsequent tax implication on such over-reporting as they always claim about any film? BOI, except for publishing the collection on its own website, has no credibility whatsoever. For the collection report of BOI to be even considered for debate, one needs to be aware of the mechanism being adopted by BOI to find out collections from theater across India. The collection figures reported by BOI are not subject to any statutory audit.so i thought they will help me in gaining support for putting correct boxofficei figures for Jab Tak Hai Jaan and Son of Sardaar both.Nothing else much.Pardon me if i have done any mistake.User talk:Abhinavname 05:45, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

False information
You copy-pasted my birthdate and my registering date to your userpage, which is not good. Please delete it.Plea$ant 1623  ✉  14:12, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

December 2012
Hello, I'm Mediran. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Azad Kashmir without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Mediran  talk to me! 09:42, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Attacks of 26/11, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trawler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

BOI
Hi,thanks for updating rankings but i think there is no need to update daily,you may update it weekly. ---zeeyanketu talk to me 18:53, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at 2012 Delhi gang rape case shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  05:18, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Also, it appears that you are repeatedly inserting text in violation of our copyright policy. If you repeat that you are likely to be blocked. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  05:44, 23 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Even I hate BOI but can't do anything. BOI data has always been used after a lengthy discussion. You should talk to Zekatu, he knows more about this. Ashermadan (talk) 05:54, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Golden Kela Awards.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Golden Kela Awards.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Forgot to put name 09:30, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of R. Torre & Company, Inc.


Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give a page a different title by copying and pasting its content into R. Torre & Company, Inc.. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes.

Unfortunately, we will have to temporarily delete the new article you created under speedy deletion criterion G6, so that the page you intended to move may be properly moved in a way that will preserve its edit history. To avoid this problem in the future, please use the "Move" tab at the top of articles in order to re-title them.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

Actually I waork in IT company and i am working on torani website.The company name is not Torani. its R. Torre & Company, Inc.. you can see on internet also. u can see this link  http://toranistore.com/products/syrup the bottom footer part the copyright section with the corrdect company name. its just the webiste is called torani.. Abhinavname (talk) 18:59, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * DO NOT remove the historymerge tag from the article again. This is not about the title of the article but how you moved the article from one title to another.  By cutting and pasting the text into a new article rather than moving the text you lost the history of all the previous contributions to the article by other editors.  The tag flags this up to an administrator who can correct this action without losing the additional information you have added. NtheP (talk) 22:40, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Torani
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Torani a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. § FreeRangeFrog croak 22:39, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Pre release business
Your answer is here WP:CRYSTAL.Dont do anything without knowledge of facts. ---zeeyanketu talk to me 17:26, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Why need to follow anything which creates edit warring only,You have been updating BOI figures regularly.Just go with them only.Taran Adarsh and Komal Nahta are sold out persons.I never agree with them on Jab Tak hain jaan page too.Got it "Sanjeet" ---zeeyanketu talk to me 15:07, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
 * That article will be fully protected if i does,If you are happy with it add it,but i believe you will follow the same trend i am following now.Sanjeet ---zeeyanketu talk to me 15:20, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

2012 Delhi gang rape case
There is a discussion goin on the talk page, what made you move the page before the consensus has reached? --sarvajna (talk) 15:37, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Here is the authentic proof from UK tabloid Daily Mirror about Jyoti's name
Here is the link abt Jyoti Singh Pandey and her friend Awindra Pandey, 28 revelead by Jyoti's Singh Pandey.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/india-gang-rape-victims-father-1521289

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/indian-gang-rape-victim-jyoti-1521178

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/indian-gang-rape-victims-father-1522185

User talk:Abhinavname 14:45, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I have moved the article back, because you don't have consensus to move it. Please, do not do that again or you'll be blocked for move warring. If you think the current title is wrong, please start a discussion and get consensus. Salvio  Let's talk about it! 16:21, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Jyoti Singh Pandey
Please see Talk:2012 Delhi gang rape case, where there is an emerging consensus to include no references to Pandey's name at all. Unless consensus shifts, please do not make any further edits with the aim of publishing the victim's name. There is a strong policy-based argument against it, and a long history of not releasing victims' names in cases like this. — Francophonie &#38; Androphilie  ( Je vous invite à me parler  ) 17:49, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
 * You need to note that UK tabloids such as the Daily Mirror and Sunday People are notoriously unreliable. They are less newspapers than entertainment sheets. - Sitush (talk) 00:00, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Maroof Raza
Hello Abhinavname,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Maroof Raza for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, YuMaNuMa Contrib 17:06, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Sock
I am 100% sure you are sock of Sanjeetbond,Gajinidetails,Besharamsun etc.It's quite easy for me to judge it.What is the need to change figures if i clearly mention in edit summary that they are just predictions.Please stop these things untill i report you to SPI investigations again.Check user's would easily trace you. ---zeeyanketu talk to me 19:18, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:TheAttacksof 2611.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:TheAttacksof 2611.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:08, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of P.K.(2014 film) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article P.K.(2014 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/P.K.(2014 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 21:06, 18 January 2013 (UTC)