User talk:Abhishek.arya

May 2016
Hello, I'm Gogo Dodo. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Manusmriti Dahan Din without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:36, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

The Vedic Vichar
The article The Vedic Vichar has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article was about a real person or group of people, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or an organized event, but did not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is actually significant enough for an encyclopedia article, you are free to re-create it, but this time you need to demonstrate that, which is best done by citing to reliable, secondary sources that are entirely unconnected to the topic.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:36, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   07:07, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

What mistakes i made? I m just citing about the court cases on Manusmriti

May 2016
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  10:19, 7 May 2016 (UTC) What you wanna say??

Abhishek.arya, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Manu Smriti, you may be blocked from editing. &#160; Discant  X  06:33, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Manu Smriti
I undid your edit to Manu Smriti as it appeared to contain wp:original research. Wikipedia is not the place for original content. Anything significant added to Wikipedia should be specifically stated in wp:reliable sources which should be wp:inline cited. Combining multiple sources to generate information is called synthesis and should also be avoided. i.e. A says X is wonderful, B says X is wonderful, C says X is wonderful. synth: X is wonderful. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 06:57, 10 May 2016 (UTC)