User talk:Abhishek Kasaudhan 123

Hello, I would like to request you to add Episode/Story Arc Section in TMKOC page like Anupamaa and various other shows. As show has more than 3500+ episodes. It would be really great. Please consider it. Thank you 🙏 ... PS: I tried to add these on pri (who update episode count) page but I'm not able to do that hence I'm requesting you.

Episodes/Story Arc

 * The section is incomplete kindly help adding summaries.

... Please add these.

Hi there, please consult an administrator regarding your issue. As far as my concern goes, The Story Arc part was previously there in the Wikipage but it later got removed by an administrator. Thanks Abhishek this side( Say hi!) 13:49, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

The Administrator who removed Story arc wasn't even indian. And probably didn't know anything about TMKOC. I'm not able to find any administrator to talk to, please add these as now the page is protected from vandalism. We will look after if someone removes it. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.62.246.218 (talk) 12:03, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Complete sentences
In case you've never seen what a quality cast and character list is supposed to look like, I'll point you to List of Millennium characters for your edification. Edits like this where you wedge "Former:Manvi Singh" into a parenthetical don't actually communicate any real information to readers unfamiliar with the series. The point of an encyclopedia article is not to only be a resource for fans of the show, but for members of our global audience who might be interested in researching the series. That is why we should be using complete sentences to express ideas if they are crucial to our understanding of the series. Even the improvement "Maya Rudra Roy, formerly named Manvi Singh" doesn't tell the reader why this character has multiple names, so there are still major gaps in the information being provided.

An example of what should be there is something like: "Jane Doe is introduced as a businesswoman from Patna. It is later revealed that she was living under an assumed identity, and her real name is actually Gloria Bloggs. After serving 2 years in prison for identity theft, she later marries Bhuvan Smythe.

This content is far more useful academically than the typical focus on family trees and the terse, poorly thought-out content that usually appears in Indian TV articles. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:24, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
 * So, do you want Cast and characters of Beyhadh S02 to be like List of Millennium Characters.. if so I would like to take the opportunity after your permission. So allow me to do so and if you find anything missing you could insert it. Abhishek Kasaudhan 123 (talk) 07:52, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I've moved the above talk page comment you left on my talk page to yours, so that this conversation can remain in one place. List of Millennium characters is a Featured List Article, which means that it has been scrutinised by other editors and has been found to be consistent with community standards. It represents the highest level of quality. There is an entire Manual of Style for television articles that tells editors what the community expects articles to look like. WP:TVCAST is the set of guidelines for cast sections. Short story: Character descriptions should tell a reader about the character. Is the character a schemer? What do they do for a living, if it is relevant. What is their personality like? Are they addicted to drugs? Does this impact their storylines? And then beyond those descriptions, having real-world information about how an actor was cast, who (if anybody) the character was based on, etc. If none of that information can be found or written about, then at the very least we should be writing complete sentences that explain ideas clearly. See List of SpongeBob SquarePants characters which might be an example of a middleground between the current version and the Millennium list. I don't think there should be a unique article for the cast/characters just yet but if you want to improve the current cast sections with WP:TVCAST as your guide, you certainly don't need my permission. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:45, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Abhishek, you did a really great job with the character descriptions at Beyhadh 2. It still needs some grammar work and copyediting, but you should be proud to have created one of the first Indian soap opera articles with clear character descriptions. I hope that you've started a trend. Good work. If you are feeling even more ambitious, trying to find information about how the roles were developed or how the actors were cast would be useful in that section as well, again per WP:TVCAST, which wants us to also think about real-world content, not just "in-universe" details. But no pressure. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:18, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Beyhadh 2, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jusdafax (talk) 12:38, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for appreciations..but someone keeps removing my edits anonymously.... Abhishek Kasaudhan 123 (talk) 13:58, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
 * Devon Ke Dev...Mahadev ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Devon_Ke_Dev...Mahadev check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Devon_Ke_Dev...Mahadev?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added links pointing to Mahadev, Sati and Unity
 * Karn Sangini ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Karn_Sangini check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Karn_Sangini?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added links pointing to Gandhari and Arjun

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 31
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Devon Ke Dev...Mahadev, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mahadev, Sati and Unity ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Devon_Ke_Dev...Mahadev check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Devon_Ke_Dev...Mahadev?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:35, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

I removed it Abhishek Kasaudhan 123 (talk) 13:30, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rajat Verma


A tag has been placed on Rajat Verma, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Sanyam.wikime (talk) 12:08, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rajat Verma
Hello Abhishek Kasaudhan 123,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Rajat Verma for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 12:52, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rajat Verma


A tag has been placed on Rajat Verma requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Sanyam.wikime (talk) 14:15, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 21
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Mahabharat (2013 TV series) ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Mahabharat_%282013_TV_series%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Mahabharat_%282013_TV_series%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Gandhari
 * Suryaputra Karn ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Suryaputra_Karn check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Suryaputra_Karn?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Gandhari

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment: Abhishek, this message above is supposed to be a clue to you that you messed up by adding a problematic link to a disambiguation page, rather than to the page you intended. In an ideal world, you'd acknowledge the mistakes and take efforts to fix them. We don't want to point to disambiguation pages, because it forces readers to have to decide which link is correct, when that is something you should have done. I have fixed these for you, but won't do that again. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:16, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Slashes
Hi there, re: this, would you please refrain from using slashes in article prose? These slashes appear in hundreds of Indian TV articles, but the problem with them, is that they are ambiguous. There is no universal way to interpret content separated by slashes. Sometimes it indicates that one actor played multiple roles, sometimes it indicates that an actor played a single character who used multiple names, sometimes it indicates various nicknames people called the character. As an example, once I came across this:
 * Giaa Manek/Rubina Dilaik as Jeannie/Jenu/Chutki/Gita/Mitram/ Rajjo Ji/Jwala/Roopa/Mrs.Khanna (2012−2013)/(2013−2014)

Did the actress Gia Manek change her name to Rubina Dilaik? Are these two actors who worked at the same time? Did they work intermittently depending on who was available? Did one replace the other? Are all those names after the "as" unique characters? The same character but with different nicknames? Are they nonuplets? What's with the parentheticals separated by slashes? Are they trying to say that Manek had this/these roles from 2012-2013, but then Dilaik took over from 2013-2014? Or does it mean that both actors worked until some point in 2013, then were pulled from the show and then came back later in 2013?

See the problem? The more frequently these are added, the more people think that they are helpful, and the problem spreads. Thanks for your consideration, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:03, 19 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi there, I totally agree with your points Sir but since the show was new and I didn't have much knowledge about the show; then I had to go with Slashes. However, as soon as, I manage to acquire some understanding of show, I would edit it accordingly. Thanks for concern.

And a problem, I am interested to share is whenever I add cleanup templates to an article with improper/long plot or maybe distributed Cast section, a bunch of IP users spam the article and remove the templates, I have been tired to giving them warnings through their Talk pages but they seems to be resistant to admonishments or maybe being new at Wikipedia makes them unaware of the Talk page feature; I am not sure though. So, How am I supposed to tackle such users. Need suggestions 😄 Thanks Abhishek Kasaudhan 123 (talk) 19:19, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * You would have to point me in the direction of where you're seeing these problematic issues, then I could better help you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:39, 20 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Hey there; while surfing through Saath Nibhaana Saathiya 2's edit history, I found some of the edits which were strange; specific to these 1, 2, 3. Its been a high time to protect the page from editing by IP Users. In a pair of days, there were so many edits leading towards vandalism in the article; or if there is some other methods to tackle the same. Thanks Abhishek Kasaudhan 123 (talk) 15:51, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Versions in other languages
Re: this, this is part of a problem that started when people added "Linguistic versions" sections to Indian TV articles, which makes no sense to me in English. This was going on in a number of articles. Whenever I would change it back to something like Adaptations, (like I did here), it would get changed back to Linguistic versions. I think a lot of random editors just blindly copy stuff from one article to another without thinking. Since I thought that maybe someone was objecting to the description of "adaptations", I then went through about 25 articles and changed "Linguistic versions" to "Versions in other languages". So in this edit, Noobie anonymous was probably following my lead, having seen these changes in other articles.

For what it's worth, Adaptations is probably a better heading. But also note that there's nothing at MOS:TV that mentions what such a section should be called. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:08, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi there; but then what I have to follow, "Versions in other languages" or "Adaptations"?Abhishek this side( Say hi!) 05:10, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Suryaputra Karn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arjun.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

RadhaKrishn
Did u even try once to make consensus with fellow editors before changing Genre of the show as per your whims? Check WP:CON. You asked me to refer WP:TV, may I ask which exact guideline written in WP:TV gives you impression that shows like RadhaKrishn do not falls under Mythology? As per my knowledge, show is partially connected with religion/spirituality, its characters are taken from Hindu scriptures and many of the stories can be found in multiple Hindu texts like Braham Vaivarta Purana and Garga Samhita. By the way, what is Sumellika Purana you are referring to? Seems you yourself are not neutral while editing RadhaKrishn page and better not use taunting language here on this platform. This time I am letting it go but next time I'll report. Anyway, better go through Myth for better understanding of mythology genre. In case of any further discussion, write to me or use talk page of the article to resolve conflict. In case this dispute is not resolved, I have to include other senior editors for consensus. Thanks. Kridha (talk) 04:05, 30 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi, there. After thoroughly reading your reply and before adding my own reply, few things about the former need to be pointed out. First of all, this is not a conflict but you're the one, turning the tables and making it into a conflict of interests. Moreover, a royal way of talking doesn't fall under threatening others like you did. Before, asking a senior editor to handle the matter, one should learn, how those senior editors would have conversed in someone's talk page. Now coming to your point, the guideline that doesn't let Radhakrishn show fall under mythology genre is more specifically written in MOS:TV where it is clearly written that before giving any genre to any show, it should be "reliability sourced." And the sources you provided doesn't look to be at par with that reliability. Radhakrishn winning "Best Mythology Show Award" in 2019 doesn't really prove anything much. Also, the other 2 sources you gave literally made null bridges between Radhakrishn show and mythology. Check MOS:TV. Also, I agree show is connected to Hindu religion because the characters are taken from various Hindu scriptures and some from Mahabharata but none of the story shown in this serial completely or even partially comes from Garga Samhita or Braham Vaivarta Purana. (By the way please provide me a proper link to Brahma Vaivarta Purana, so that I can crave even an iota of story possible, from the show in that purana). Moreover, I have read a lot of Sanata Dharma Scriptures, and in none of them I found Radharani to be filled with impurities and Lord Krishna trying to purify it, neither did I found Radha marrying Ayan (Chhaya Radha married Ayan), nowhere I found Radha's presence in epic Mahabharata and also aftermath of Mahabharata. And there's literally numerous things I can point out but ain't you got time to read all those and I got to write. I wrote Sumellikan Purana because it was you who pointed me that "shows based on literature falls under mythology category," so I was wondering which literature exactly has such horrible stories, for an instance I thought maybe Sumellikan Purana (That was a sarcasm, due to your "literature" excuse). I'm pretty much neutral while editing the article but you definitely don't respect Vaishnavism as your userpage shows. The show just have the characters from the scriptures you have mentioned, not the story, otherwise shows like Yum Hai Hum should also fall under mythological category but they just don't as I mentioned previously.

The makers of the show themselves use creative freedom and has clearly mentioned that they just want to teach people the true meaning of love and what people want to see. You can watch their videos on official YouTube channel of Swastik Productions. Also, there are numerous videos on YouTube and articles on google that I can put forward and prove that this show is not really mythological and should be considered merely a fictional show. (Mythic fiction to be exact). Also, daily soaps like such fallunder drama category only. Moreover, this article has been written in pretty naive way. Look at MOS:TV where you would find, how exactly a plot is written for a TV show and just take a look at the horribly written lengthy plot here which was even more horrible, before I trimmed it to an extent. So, why you're just up to me, regarding the genre issue, why just don't you help me and others regarding fixing the plot and other aspects of the article. You're asking me to ask my fellow editors before making the genre according to my wishes, but why the same question was not asked by you regarding the horrible plot and confusing cast and characters section of this article (See WP:CAST) to the editors who made it like such. At last, if according to you it is a mythological show, then mention the scriptures and texts, the show has been based upon, completely or partially, (like many other Mythological shows has) on the article page before giving the genre of mythology to it. Else I will have to seek help from WP:RFAA. Thanks and before leaving a message to my talk page, make sure to add the details of the scriptures, this show has been based on (according to you), on the main page of this article  Abhishek this side( Say hi!) 11:52, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi. Firstly, from next time onwards atleast tag me so that I can get the notification of your reply. Coming to your point, that you are trying to be sarcastic while mentioning Sumellika puran to me, better avoid it and stop being Judgemental by writing things like "I don't respect Vaishnavism". Now, my first question - Did you try to reach out any fellow editor or me when there is conflict in genre? Is WP:CON not important for you? Secondly, Did you once go through the Myth article which clearly states that Mythology doesn't mean that stories fall under this genre is objectively true. Mythology is different from History which itself gives room for creative freedom. Thirdly, How can you say that Newspaper articles are not reliable source? Every other Mythological show article is using newspaper articles for the reference. Check WP:RS. Fourth, I agree the show has modified its story in the name of creativity but not the complete show is a fictional work. It is partially based on creative freedom and partially on Hindu Scriptures. I am listing down few stories which are taken majorly from Garga Samhita and Brahma Vaivarta Purana - 1) Name of all the characters and relationship that is being shown. 2) Krishna killing asuras. Name of most of these asuras are mentioned in scriptures. 3) Krishna killing Kansa. 4) Radha Krishna marriage in presence of Lord Brahma. 5) Radha Krishna raas with Gopeshwar Mahadev. 6) Marriage of Krishna with Rukmini, Satyabhama and Jambvati. 7) Krishna killing Narkasura. 8) Krishna lifting Goverdhan mountain 9) Story of Radha Kund and Shyam Kund. 10) Krishna leaving Vrindavan and establishing Dwarka. 11) Killing of Banasura. 12) Killing of Rukmi by Balarama. 13) Radha Krishna meeting with sage ashtvakra. 14) Sridama cursing Radha. 15) Radha Krishna descends from Goloka to Earth. 16) Tale of Syamantak mani. 17) Tale of all Krishna avatars - Matsaya, Kurma, Narsimha, Varah, Vaman Parshuram, Ram 18) Mahabharata All these stories are mentioned in Garga Samhita. So, you cannot say that show is completely fictional. That's why genre should be Mythology as it is not objectively true but simultaneously not completely false. Creators have definitely used their creative freedom but still the basic story remained same excluding 3-4 stories which are twisted. And yes, both Garga Samhita and Braham Vaivarta Purana are available online, you can go through it. Thanks. Kridha (talk) 14:06, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

I have opened thread to discuss Genre on RadhaKrishn talk page. Also, multiple standard newspaper articles mentioning RadkaKrishn as Mythological show is listed down there. Kindly go through it. Check WP:NEWSORG as it clearly states that "News reporting from well-established news outlets is generally considered to be reliable for statements of fact". I have listed articles only from standard newspapers like Times of India, Indian Express and Hindustan Times. Also, in my opinion the talkpage of the RadhaKrishn is better place to discuss this issue as other concerned editors can also participate there and share their viewpoints. So any further discussion on this matter will be discussed there from my side. Feel free to join there. Thanks. Kridha (talk) 14:19, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

WP:AN3
Hello, regarding the recent conflict of views regarding the genre of RadhaKrishn, I have reported the issue on WP:AN3. Let the third party decide now. Thanks. Link - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring Kridha (talk) 15:49, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

You tried to copy me making me tired, by the way, your report as been declined as a result of it being malformed. You can check yourself. Kudos 👌 Abhishek this side( Say hi!) 16:59, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)