User talk:Abhishekkailawer5

January 2024
Hello, I'm Gluonz. An edit that you recently made to ChatGPT in education seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or another application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. I have reverted your edit. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – Gluonz  talk contribs 19:53, 8 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Ok thanks Abhishekkailawer5 (talk) 19:55, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * No problem! If you’d like help, let me or another editor know. – Gluonz  talk contribs 19:58, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * ok Abhishekkailawer5 (talk) 20:02, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Gemini (language model), you may be blocked from editing. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 21:32, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * Ok but I try to make best Abhishekkailawer5 (talk) 21:38, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello Abhishekkailawer5. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Content centric networking, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Abhishekkailawer5. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Seawolf35 T--C 08:28, 9 January 2024 (UTC)


 * ❤️ Abhishekkailawer5 (talk) 08:34, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Abhishekkailawer5, and the template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. That wasn't an answer. Seawolf35 T--C 08:46, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at ChatGPT. Chaotıċ Enby  (t · c) 10:25, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi, if you make more edits in the style you have been, you may be at risk of losing editing privileges without further warning. If you want to avoid being blocked from editing, I would suggest using more than a heart emoji to explain why your edits sound so promotional. If you have a conflict of interest (for example, paid editing, or being closely associated with any of the topics of articles you have edited), please disclose it before making any more edits. It seems you have used AI as a tool for at least some of your edits, so, if you do not have a conflict of interest, I can imagine the chatbot you are using might be adding promotional language. If this is the case, you should try to avoid using the chatbot at all in most of your future editing (in edits you do use the chatbot for, please specify that the output should be encyclopedic and not promotional, and carefully check whether each aspect of the output is accurate before adding it to Wikipedia). In general, try not to completely get rid of well-established paragraphs, unless there is a good reason that a new paragraph is significantly more appropriate. However, you might want to avoid using a chatbot at all and just make more minor edits for the time being. If you are unsure about something, ask me or another editor about it. Anyway, best of luck, and hopefully your future editing can be more constructive. – Gluonz  talk contribs 14:50, 9 January 2024 (UTC)


 * ok i understand Abhishekkailawer5 (talk) 14:57, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I’m glad you understand. Please explain your situation as soon as possible. – Gluonz  talk contribs 16:17, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nowizine


A tag has been placed on Nowizine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. JTtheOG (talk) 22:13, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 18:51, 9 January 2024 (UTC)


 * I am not doing any advertisement or spam I'm just edit please unblock me " I am going to learn about Wikipedia editing all information then I will going to edit article " please help me Abhishekkailawer5 (talk) 05:05, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * If you would like to submit an unblock request, please follow the instructions above. You would probably have to be more specific than that about why you should be unblocked, though. – Gluonz  talk contribs 13:16, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Noting here Sockpuppet investigations/Abhishekkailawer5. This kind of linking of a person to their LinkedIn account isn't correct. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:24, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
 * {unblock|reason=Please unblock my Wikipedia account "i am not coming for any purpose like advertisement or spamming"
 * I am just want contribute on Wikipedia
 * Thank you Abhishekkailawer5 (talk) 20:13, 11 January 2024 (UTC)}}
 * You forgot the first { in your request. You should have two of them at the front. You might want try being more specific than that in your unblock rationale, but you can also just use what you already typed, if you would like. – Gluonz  talk contribs 20:51, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
 * {unblock|reason={Please unblock my Wikipedia account "i am not coming for any purpose like advertisement or spamming"
 * I am just want contribute on Wikipedia
 * Thank you Abhishekkailawer5 (talk) 20:13, 11 January 2024 (UTC)}} Abhishekkailawer5 (talk) 20:57, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
 * No, not like that. I mean putting both of them right next to each other, like ”{{“ . – Gluonz  talk contribs 20:59, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
 * And before the word “unblock”. – Gluonz  talk contribs 20:59, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed |1=Please unblock my Wikipedia account "i am not coming for any purpose like advertisement or spamming" ::::::I am just want contribute on Wikipedia ::::::Thank you Abhishekkailawer5 (talk) 20:13, 11 January 2024 (UTC) |decline = Given your contributions so far, Wikipedia is clearly better off without your contributions. Yamla (talk) 23:07, 11 January 2024 (UTC)}}