User talk:Abhishektondon

Welcome!

 * }

November 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Palani Baba, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Palani Baba was changed by Abhishektondon (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.94487 on 2011-11-08T09:25:25+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:25, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

January 2012
Your addition to Aurangzeb has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. ''You copied material from http://www.dnaindia.com/india/analysis_the-uncalled-for-fascination-with-aurangzeb_1544093 which in any case fails our criteria at WP:RS. In addtion, you removed neutral material and added material from a Hindutva perspective. Please read WP:NPOV.'' Dougweller (talk) 06:34, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

More copyvio
The material you added at Sadhvi Rithambara was also copyvio. Note that in any case as it was from the subject's site it probably shouldn't be used. Please make sure that any material you add to articles is not only not copy and paste, but it is not just slightly rewritten. It should be in your own words. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 10:36, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

And I deleted Vatsalyagram entirely as you simply copied its website. Dougweller (talk) 15:20, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * @ Abhishek: Given your history of plagiarizing copyrighted material, your edits from now on will be thoroughly scrutinized by myself and Doug! If you need any advice or help, then feel free to contact me in my talk page. Joyson Prabhu  Holla at me!   12:31, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Inclusion of unsourced editorializing and personal POV
Please stop it. Your edits to homeopathy related subjects does not conform to encyclopedic writing or WP:MEDRS. -- Brangifer (talk) 00:26, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Edit warring at Homeopathy
Your recent editing history at Homeopathy shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. -- Brangifer (talk) 00:29, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

You should also note that the homeopathy article comes under discretionary sanctions, as a subject concerning pseudoscience and/or fringe science:

AndyTheGrump (talk) 00:38, 17 September 2014 (UTC)