User talk:Abhivedaon

February 2023
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.  MrOllie (talk) 20:38, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

I don't want to add external link but i just add a proof of that edit on site where a whole article is written. So i just add this article link to my recent edit. I don't know how to add my article where I write whole article on recent edit topics. Can you suggest how can I do it. Abhivedaon (talk) 21:03, 21 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Please read WP:RS throughly. You may add content based on the sorts of sources explained here, like books from major publishers, peer reviewed journals, etc. Recently created blogs such as the one you cited do not meet our requirements. You just also write neutrally - expressing alarm in text as you did is not the way an encyclopedia is written. - MrOllie (talk) 21:39, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Your edit to Human resource management has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. Sam Kuru (talk) 10:08, 15 March 2023 (UTC)


 * But how a text can be copyright material? I can give you permission to use my materials. I am owner of vedaon.com and i am copyright holder. If you don't believe that i am a owner of vedaon so how can i prove that? Abhivedaon (talk) 10:44, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
 * We cannot take the word of an anonymously created account in a legal matter. You would technically need to follow the process at WP:DCP to donate your materials under a compatible license. In this case, there's really not a point: we cannot use your blog posts, and we're not looking for more links back to your blog, which you were explicitly warned about. You are welcome to add competently-written and carefully sourced material. Please do not add another link to you blog - that will like result in the suspension of this account. Sam Kuru (talk) 11:08, 15 March 2023 (UTC)