User talk:Abi25gail05

Welcome!
Hello, Abi25gail05, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

January 2017
Hello, I'm Kleuske. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ryback have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kleuske (talk) 12:31, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kane (wrestler). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kleuske (talk) 12:41, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ryback, you may be blocked from editing. Kleuske (talk) 12:53, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kane (wrestler) ‎. -- ferret (talk) 19:53, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Betty Homer


A tag has been placed on Betty Homer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Tagishsimon (talk) 12:14, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

March 2019
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Jinder Mahal. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:21, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Royal Rumble (1994), you may be blocked from editing. Zingarese talk  ·  contribs  22:01, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Royal Rumble (1994)
I removed the information from this article because it is not reliably sourced. To be considered reliably sourced, you would have to include a citation to show where the information can be verified by other readers. If, as you seem to be implying, someone told you the information, that wouldn't meet the criteria for a reliable source (regardless of how close this person might be to the information, which could very well be true). We can only include information that can be verified, and unpublished personal knowledge just can't meet the threshold for reliability. It's not that I doubt you--I'm just editing according to encyclopedia policies. I hope this helps clear up some confusion. GaryColemanFan (talk) 03:10, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Administrator's Noticeboard
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. GaryColemanFan (talk) 21:08, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Suppressed edits
Hi, Abi25gail05, I have unfortunately had to suppress some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information about you. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at Guidance for younger editors and On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thanks, and sorry for messing about with your pages! &#8209; Iridescent 21:36, 29 March 2019 (UTC) &#8209; Iridescent 21:36, 29 March 2019 (UTC)