User talk:Abish sharma

February 2022
Hello, I'm Khgk. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Khgk (talk) 15:32, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello Abish sharma. The nature of your edits, such as the ones you made to Raheja Developers, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Abish sharma. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Bishonen &#124; tålk 17:00, 14 February 2022 (UTC).

Blocked
On second thoughts, and looking at your contributions, never mind about disclosing your paid editing. It's obvious that you have been gaming our autoconfirmed rules by making ten tiny edits adding (rather unnecessary) links, one at a time, to articles. And when you had made exactly ten such edits, you went to edit the semiprotected Raheja Developers. You have been blocked indefinitely as not being here to help build an encyclopedia, but purely for promotion and advertising. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen &#124; tålk 17:26, 14 February 2022 (UTC).