User talk:Abisharan/archive

never
I deleted all you message without reading. you are a sick and a cruel person. I would not like to see you ever again at my talk page.--Mbz1 (talk) 00:23, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Don't worry if you don't want to, you won't see me. Now, what you will keep seen is the problems that you do have. You got into them and are still in them since months ago. Am I not right? And there is a subtle mistake that you are making when addressing them. Curious about what it is? I will be here. Sick and cruel maybe but that is only a manifestation of being plain and true, no fictitious colors, no hidden things. Good luck with your holy war. Abisharan (talk) 00:57, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
 * OMG, how didn't I guess before. I know who you are. You left as Dr. Jekyll, and you came back few days later as Mr. Hyde. You're really, really sick. You need to get some help. I feel sorry for you.--Mbz1 (talk) 01:39, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Is it really me who is sick? Maybe. Sort of a different illness as your, fortunately. Anyway, you don't want to look to what I am saying, no point to so much chitchatting. If you can really name my illnesses do so. It is useful and I don't mind. Abisharan (talk) 01:57, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
 * If you'd like to get a response at the message you left at Alison talk page, please remove it from there and re-post to you own talk page. As you rightly said Alison has nothing to do with the message that was addressed to me, and her talk page should be left alone.--Mbz1 (talk) 04:11, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I asked you to delete it from Alison's talk page, you only copied it. Please delete it, it does not belong there, and we'll talk,--Mbz1 (talk) 08:07, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, it does belong there. It is not only a message to you, it is also a message to the other two that were there. Why would I post it there if not because it completes a story only said in half? I said to continue here because the rest seems to be going to be about me. But notice the text there hints the readers here so that if they want to read more they know here to come. If I delete that paragraph there, not only info is lost there, but also nothing links to the continuation here. Abisharan (talk) 12:09, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

..................................................

(copied from another place)

Sole purpose? Just look my at my user contributions. Sorry, but you are prizing yourself too much thinking that the my sole purpose is to "help you". It is the other way around. Just by chance, I noticed that your problems had not stopped (since they even came to disrupt FPC). You are being a bit paranoid as you were when I reviewed one of your pictures in the most impersonal and objective way, as I always try to do. I just happens that among the things that I see, I support those that I think are right. No matter what. When I saw people doing wrong to you I condemned it. If I see you doing wrong I tell you. But not more than once. You say that I need some help. Go ahead, tell me the symptoms that you see. (In my talk page, since Alison should be annoyed with all these posts.) Abisharan (talk) 03:34, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

...................................................

Common languages are all context dependent. This message is what it is within that contest. That's why I believe more in just copying.

You are Spanish.
You said "edulcorantion," which is close to edulcorante, or "sugar." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.107.144.106 (talk) 08:03, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I did. Although it is also a word in English that means the same thing as sweetening. Also chemist used for the action of rinsing a beaker with water. It is a nice word, specially if you already used sweet-ie in a previous sentence. Things sound better when you dont have to repeat words. Abisharan (talk) 14:26, 29 March 2010 (UTC)