User talk:Abj951

Famous quotations
Hi, and thanks for your helpful additions. On Wikipedia, we generally try to work quotes into the text or as pull quotes. Failing that, we move them to Wikiquote. Take a look at Quotations to learn more, and happy editing! Viriditas (talk) 05:48, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, again. I've removed the quotes and started a wikiquote article.  Looking over the quotes you chose, I'm a bit unclear on their importance.  Generally, we want to choose quotes that best represent the author or their ideas.  However, I can't figure out why the quotes you chose are important or what they intended to convey. Viriditas (talk) 05:50, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, I see the problem. You chose the quotes out of context, and only quoted them in part.  When you quote an author, you generally want to capture the entire idea.  I've remedied this by fixing the first one and adding it to wikiquote. Viriditas (talk) 05:56, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Esquel Group
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Esquel Group, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Asia Business Council. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:28, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

November 2010
Your addition to Esquel Group has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. --§ Pump me up  06:32, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Esquel Group


A tag has been placed on Esquel Group requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --§ Pump me up  06:32, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Esquel Group


A tag has been placed on Esquel Group, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Esquel Group and leave a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

November 2010 (continued)
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Esquel Group. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2010 (UTC)