User talk:Abraararique

Speedy deletion nomination of Stefan Pylarinos


A tag has been placed on Stefan Pylarinos, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shirt58 (talk) 11:11, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Reply
Hi, so many problems. You should note that the article was identified as spam by two different editors before I deleted it. I deleted your article because
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that he meets the notability guidelines.It is now Wikipedia policy that biographical articles about living people must have independent verifiable references, as defined in the link, or they will be deleted. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to him or his company, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what he claims or interviewing him. You gave no references at all. Even if the few facts amongst the spam are true, I can't see any evidence for notability, he's a guy with a blog, a few ebooks, an unspecified and unverified income from his sites, and a huge sense of his own importance.
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
 * You had multiple spam links to sites associated with him including in the text, an entire so-called resources section, and multiple external links. Note that there shouldn't be any links to YouTube or social media in any case.
 * Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include:  famous blog... inspires thousands of people who wants nothing less than an extraordinary life. He loves to teach and help people to change their lives... "Inspiring Change, Transforming Lives". He says that he feels extremely blessed&mdash; and that's just the first three sentences, following the first spamlink, the rest is in the same tone.
 * and of course his projects are bolded

*If you have a conflict of interest when editing this article, you must declare it. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that he is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.
 * there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections. that's particularly the case when they are all spamlinks.
 * the article was created in a single edit without wikilinks or references, and looks as if was copied from an unknown and possibly copyrighted source. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.
 * If you have a financial stake in promoting this topic, note that paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization directly or indirectly to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a black hat practice. Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:    . Please do not edit further until you answer this message.

Jimfbleak - talk to me?  16:36, 23 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Note that Timothy Sykes, while not perfect, has references, mostly acceptable and a much less fan-page tone Jimfbleak - talk to me?  16:42, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Abraar Arique


A tag has been placed on Abraar Arique requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  GILO  A& E&uArr;  15:34, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tim Grittani
Hello Abraararique,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Tim Grittani for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 14:02, 4 February 2016 (UTC)